HILLARY

[exGOPer]

Please indicate where I said that Comey said there was no evidence of wrongdoing on Trump's part. ----(mic drop)

Sure

No evidence of any wrongdoing. As for Hillary, Comey said there evidence of wrongdoing, but would not recommend criminal proceedings. Apples and Oranges.

Where's the mic now?

 

[Buy1Sell2]

Sure




Where's the mic now?

Please reread my posting and indicate where I maintain that Comey said directly that there was no evidence of wrongdoing on Trump's part. I can clearly see where I commented on Comey's direct information on Hillary's wrongdoing.
--(Guitar turned up to 10 drop)--

 

[Buy1Sell2]

---BBBBRRRRRRAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNGGGGG!!!---

 

[exGOPer]

Please reread my posting and indicate where I maintain that Comey said directly that there was no evidence of wrongdoing on Trump's part. I can clearly see where I commented on Comey's direct information on Hillary's wrongdoing.
--(Guitar turned up to 10 drop)--

We were discussing Comey, and in that context you said there is no evidence of any wrong doing. If you leewayed into something irrelevant then it's not my fault.

Secondly, even without Comey saying it, how do you know the results of an ongoing investigation?

 

[Buy1Sell2]

Secondly, even without Comey saying it, how do you know the results of an ongoing investigation?

We can only go by what's been presented, and to date there hasn't been any evidence of wrongdoing on Trump's part. We must assume given the length of time that the investigation has gone on, that it would have been put forth. If not, and it comes later, then that is a discussion that can be held at that time. The fact remains right now though, that the Hillary was the only one of the two that has had wrongdoing brought forth against here and for whatever reason, it was not pursued. Clearly, there is enough to bring a case, but politics were being played. --Reminder--Lynch and Bill met on June 27, 2016 at an airport in Phoenix I think and Comey came out on July 5, 2016 and suggested not making a criminal recommendation against Hillary. --May mean nothing--

 

[exGOPer]

We can only go by what's been presented, and to date there hasn't been any evidence of wrongdoing on Trump's part. We must assume given the length of time that the investigation has gone on, that it would have been put forth. If not, and it comes later, then that is a discussion that can be held at that time. The fact remains right now though, that the Hillary was the only one of the two that has had wrongdoing brought forth against here and for whatever reason, it was not pursued. Clearly, there is enough to bring a case, but politics were being played. --Reminder--Lynch and Bill met on June 27, 2016 at an airport in Phoenix I think and Comey came out on July 5, 2016 and suggested not making a criminal recommendation against Hillary. --May mean nothing--

Again - the investigation isn't done, Watergate took two years so why would you assume six months is sufficient when the administration has been cock blocking the investigation. The administration refused more resources for the Russia inquiry so ofcourse it's going to take longer.

As for your Lynch-Clinton talking point - that's precisely why Comey did that press conference or are you suggesting that Comey was in on the conspiracy?

 

[Buy1Sell2]

From Oct 31, 2016 in this journal---

Here is how it went down---Comey was told by Loretta Lynch to not recommend a criminal referral because Justice would not do anything with it. So, he said ok, but initiated revenge by openly discussing her crimes at a news conference in July. Then he waited until the appropriate time to exact the second phase of revenge and that was the revelation on Fri. --It's quite simple--

 

[exGOPer]

Here is how it went down---

Thanks for the fiction, you should write for Breitfart or Alex Jones

 

[Buy1Sell2]

It's the most plausible theory that I have seen to date.

 

[exGOPer]

It's the most plausible theory that I have seen to date.

No it's not since Comey gave additional Congressional testimony saying that there was no legal precedence for charging people for inadvertent handling of classified material. If you think he is wrong - just name one person who has been prosecuted because someone emailed them classified material.And remember Hillary was OCA, she can send any self generated email and determine it's classification on her own - so what exactly is the crime?