Hillary trails 3 repubs in swing states

It is pretty much over for Hillary.

http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/uh-oh-hillary-losing-white-women

"WSJ reports:


In June, 44% of white women had a favorable view of Mrs. Clinton, compared to 43% who didn’t. In July, those numbers moved in the wrong direction for Mrs. Clinton: Only 34% of white women saw her in a positive light, compared to 53% who had a negative impression of her, the poll found. [...]

In the first three months of the year, suburban women by a margin of 18 points had a positive view of Mrs. Clinton. In July, those numbers took a dramatic turn for the worse. By a five-point margin, suburban women had a negative view of Mrs. Clinton.

Among white women with at least a college degree, 51% had a positive view of Mrs. Clinton and 38% a negative as of June. In July, those numbers had turned to 43% positive and 47% negative."
 
So what is Al Gore doing these days? A lot of people might vote for him over another Bush just because of what happened in 2000.
 
ipatent said:
The amount of money the Clintons have amassed since leaving office is legitimate grounds for criticism, although there is ample precedent going back to Reagan. Kansas got into trouble a few years back with the NCAA after some of its players were given a few hundred dollars after graduation. Shows where our values are as a society.

Criticizing Hillary for her looks or bringing up Bill affairs seems like a low blow. I don't see why she should get anything but sympathy for having to put up with that.
More...
yes, I agree, low blows are so tempting because they have done it to us so many times, but it doesn't say much for you if you do something wrong and justify because the people you claim to be superior to also do it.

didn't we already go through this with Romney's money vs Obama's money? As far as Bill goes, I would hate to be judged on all the times my wife screwed around on me.

I guess you kind of set yourself up when you say rich men are bad, and you are nothing but a fat, rich, old whore.
 
Apparently Clinton's home server was hacked thereby compromising its contents:

“There is ample evidence that this private server was inadequately protected from foreign intelligence penetration and malicious ‘hacking,’” OPSEC writes in its letter to Kerry. “Indeed, the existence of this server and its use by senior State Department officials to send and receive official emails was first disclosed publicly by a hacker from Romania.”

http://freebeacon.com/national-secu...r-revocation-of-clintons-security-privileges/

Hillary deleted *half* of the messages on that server so the security damage assessment will only be able to consider the remaining half.

Eighteen minutes of missing audio tape seems pretty small compared to 30,000+ missing email messages from a server holding classified data.

They are talking about Joe Biden now. Yeah it is that bad.
 
As if he needs permission.

CQqWyaA.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top