Hillary trails 3 repubs in swing states

Hillary's team is now bitterly complaining that she has been attacked unfairly by, yep, the New York Times.

Its a bacon, lettuce and irony sandwich. Clearly the NYT is part of the "vast rightwing conspiracy" that Hillary trots out regularly when she or Bill is facing serious trouble. Those damned conservatives at the NYT have gone too far this time.

They are going to have to be more careful to avoid any real journalism or this unfortunate event could occur again and possibly influence an election and we all know that the NYT would never try to throw an election.
 
If Hillary is the Dem nominee, the Republicans have a chance. Ever wonder why so many unflattering pictures of her appear in the media? All public figures have bad takes. Its because they don't really like her even if she's a liberal.
 
377OHMS said:
"The top lawmakers on the House and Senate intelligence committee have been notified in recent days that the extent of classified information on Mrs. Clinton’s private email server was likely far more extensive than the four emails publicly acknowledged last week as containing some sensitive spy agency secrets."

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/30/hillary-clinton-emails-us-intelligence-preparing-m/
More...
Followed the link but spotted this...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/30/william-merideth-arrested-after-shooting-down-1800/

Right on, man.
 
377OHMS said:
"The top lawmakers on the House and Senate intelligence committee have been notified in recent days that the extent of classified information on Mrs. Clinton’s private email server was likely far more extensive than the four emails publicly acknowledged last week as containing some sensitive spy agency secrets."

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/30/hillary-clinton-emails-us-intelligence-preparing-m/
More...
yeah, we know all that, but this DOJ is never going to go after her, so it is now a true democracy that will decide her fate.
 
"The bulk of the Clintons' income came from speeches delivered to corporate and interest groups by Bill Clinton and later by Hillary Clinton after she resigned as secretary of state in early 2013."

So they took the ignoble route, instead of simply buying, gutting, and selling off the pieces of healthy companies.
 
Ricter said:
"The bulk of the Clintons' income came from speeches delivered to corporate and interest groups by Bill Clinton and later by Hillary Clinton after she resigned as secretary of state in early 2013."

So they took the ignoble route, instead of simply buying, gutting, and selling off the pieces of healthy companies.
More...

Like providing political favors to companies and banks such as UBS in return for speech fees is somehow noble.
 
The amount of money the Clintons have amassed since leaving office is legitimate grounds for criticism, although there is ample precedent going back to Reagan. Kansas got into trouble a few years back with the NCAA after some of its players were given a few hundred dollars after graduation. Shows where our values are as a society.

Criticizing Hillary for her looks or bringing up Bill affairs seems like a low blow. I don't see why she should get anything but sympathy for having to put up with that.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top