Hillary stole the primary in states with electronic voting machines. Stanford Grad Paper.

[achilles28]

Bernie got robbed badly. Debbie Turdistan-Schultz reaffirmed today she did everything in her power to get SHill elected. Hillary and her DNC are open cheats and frauds. How many felonies is this? I wonder how Bernie supporters feel about this?

A second Stanford study comparing voting machines to pre-election polls shows extreme discrepancies in many states where electronic voting machines were utilized.

The study compared 337 pre-election polls, representation about 140,000 voters across 34 primary states.

The pre-election polls were successful at predicting Clinton’s numbers in states with paper trails. However, Clinton over-performed an average of 9% in the states that use electronic voting machines but fail to provide paper evidence of this vote.

Simply speaking, Clinton beat expectations ONLY in states with unaccountable voting machines.

What’s more, two of the three companies that control the electronic voting machine market, Dominion Voting and H.I.G. Capital (i.e. hart Intercivic) are on the list of big money donors that donated to the Clinton campaign, as shown by the DNC documents leaked by Guccifer 2.0.

For example, in Louisiana, Clinton performed 12% better than the pre-election polls showed. The Republican primary didn’t show any deviation.

http://www.nationofchange.org/2016/...s-serious-voting-discrepancies-favor-clinton/

 

[achilles28]

After all that time claiming to be “neutral” as the head of the Democratic National Committee, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz let down her guard this week and admitted she had actually been working ‘to prepare for Hillary Clinton to be [their] nominee’ and to ensure her election.

It was everything that she has always denied, but we knew all along.

And the Wikileaks dump confirmed it, brought it out into the open, forced Debbie to step down as head of the DNC… but low and behold, just went to work as the chairman of Hillary’s campaign anyway. Open, brazen corruption.

Why? Because it is all just a big joke, and everyone knows it.

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz made the apparent inadvertent admission during a televised debate on Facing South Florida, where she is battling for reelection. RT reports:

“The work we did to prepare for Hillary Clinton, to be our nominee and then make sure that we could get her elected president, is absolutely critical to advancing the issues that are important,” she said.

The former DNC chair was forced to step down from her position the night before the Democratic party convention after leaked emails showed the DNC favored Clinton over Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders during the primaries.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...tz-admits-she-really-worked-hillary-while-dnc

 

[Frederick Foresight]

http://www.snopes.com/stanford-study-proves-election-fraud-through-exit-poll-discrepancies/

 

[Optionpro007]

http://www.snopes.com/stanford-study-proves-election-fraud-through-exit-poll-discrepancies/

That's irrelevant.

What is really relevant is this:

"What’s more, two of the three companies that control the electronic voting machine market, Dominion Voting and H.I.G. Capital (i.e. hart Intercivic) are on the list of big money donors that donated to the Clinton campaign, as shown by the DNC documents leaked by Guccifer 2.0."

 

[jem]

for those who don't read fredi the frauds stuff.... they question calling it a Stanford study. they did not seem to question the findings.

http://www.snopes.com/stanford-study-proves-election-fraud-through-exit-poll-discrepancies/

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

http://www.snopes.com/stanford-study-proves-election-fraud-through-exit-poll-discrepancies/

Snopes did not debunk the story. In fact, it confirmed it, except on the technical point that it was not a "Stanford" study.

The facts are devastating, no matter who reported them.

Mixture


WHAT'S TRUE: Two researchers (presumably graduate students) from Stanford University and Tilburg University co-authored a paper asserting they uncovered information suggesting widespread primary election fraud favoring Hillary Clinton had occurred across multiple states.

WHAT'S FALSE: The paper was not a "Stanford Study," and its authors acknowledged their claims and research methodology had not been subject to any form of peer review or academic scrutiny.

 

[achilles28]

Debbie Schultz admitted on RT the dnc did everything possible to ensure a Hillary win.

Votes rigged in states for Hillary with voting machines.

All super delegates awarded to Hillary.

California didn't even follow the vote. They just made up numbers

 

[der_kommissar]

That's irrelevant.

What is really relevant is this:

"What’s more, two of the three companies that control the electronic voting machine market, Dominion Voting and H.I.G. Capital (i.e. hart Intercivic) are on the list of big money donors that donated to the Clinton campaign, as shown by the DNC documents leaked by Guccifer 2.0."

This stuff doesn't bother Freddie and the clown brigade (since it's rigged in favor of their beloved candidate)...

 

[achilles28]

This stuff doesn't bother Freddie and the clown brigade (since it's rigged in favor of their beloved candidate)...

That is why they're dangerous. I'm not kidding. They support rigged elections/dictatorships so long as its a Liberal in the White House.

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

If Trump actually has Putin and an army of Russian hackers helping him as MSNBC imagines, for once we may be on equal footing with the democrat fraud machine.