Hillary is going to win’ in 2016, says Warren Buffett

Entirely possible. Maybe even likely. But a certainty? LOL. Far too many unpredictable things can happen. Warren, I'll take your wager. Since you are absolutely certain, how about 1000 to 1 odds? I'll put up a grand and you a cool million. :D
 
I don't really want Hillary as president. I don't think she'll survive the 16 years of aging the job causes. Of course I'll vote for her, even over "Donald Duck", to borrow PukeRum's expression.
 
Ricter said:
I don't really want Hillary as president. I don't think she'll survive the 16 years of aging the job causes. Of course I'll vote for her, even over "Donald Duck", to borrow PukeRum's expression.
More...

And by 2016, the public will be reminded, again, of what it means to have a Republican Congress (oh, yeah . . . ).
 
this must be some sort of fallacy. Acting like buffett knows something about politics.
isn't this the guy who stated we should raise taxes because they don't matter to business and then does a corporate inversion for burger king?
 
jem said:
this must be some sort of fallacy. Acting like buffett knows something about politics.
isn't this the guy who stated we should raise taxes because they don't matter to business and then does a corporate inversion for burger king?
More...
He was referring to two different taxes.
 
I never could see any qualifications for office with Hillary Clinton.

Aside from the dubious commodities deals, the quasi-criminal real estate deals, the conveniently lost documents is the questions of actual experience needed to serve as executive.

Let see, apparently just sharing a bed with the President somehow made her qualified for the Senate where she did *nothing* until she ran a failed campaign for President last cycle. Then she was given the opportunity to run the Department of State and she managed to so thoroughly bungle that job that people actually lost their lives as a result.

Hillary Clinton is an abject failure as a leader and most certainly should not be President.

If the media tries to throw another election they are going to find the pushback to be a bit more personal and a bit more forceful this time.

Might as well nominate Wasserman-Schultz who has actually held a job and raised a fuck-ton of money for the dems.
 
Last edited:
2016 is eons away in political terms. War and/or plagues will play a major role. That, and whether or not the republicans can find a man who has a pair. Seems highly unlikely at this point.
Whatever, I do agree with Ricter. Hillary would never survive in office. She's either stroke out or have some kind of emotional crack up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top