Hillary Clinton win = what for the economy?
- Thread starter marcoPolo21
- Start date
It is going to be so sweet waking up November 9th, and seeing the look on all the dumbfounded liberals faces after being spoon fed that Hillary is a lock. Trump was always the celebrity candidate the GOP needed (look at how far the democrat tentacles have reached past 8 years), they just had to pretend he hijacked the party to save face. Maybe it will be a wake up call for some, but not likely as I'm sure people will still go on blaming the world around them for all their problems.
Why do I believe this as an independent? Let's see. The 'joke' of a candidate, Trump, set a record for votes in the GOP primary, you've got the POTUS on late night TV and everywhere else he can taking jabs at him, you've got political history, and an economic cycle favoring a Republican, and yet the discrepancies between what is being reported and what is actually going on continue to pile higher. False narrative alert. Anyone with this level of drive is of course an egomaniac, that goes for both candidates, and how many do you know don't have serious character flaws? Zero. But how does comparing character flaws to blatant corruption as so many able bodies Americans seem to be doing make any sense? If it weren't so serious, it'd be laughable.
I have come to the conclusion that the race will come down to this - Will people's perception of Trump's character flaws, pounded into them by the media, outweigh his 'celebrity' status. Put another way, will being a celebrity get him more votes than he will lose from team Hillary's character assassination ploy.
BD
Q. Why are cocktail weenies Donald Trump's favorite hors d'oeuvre?
A. Because they're of a size that he can relate to.
All kidding aside, now that we've had our fun, I refer you once again to my answer to the OP's question:
Last edited:
A Hillary win will destroy the economy in the long-run. A Donald Trump win will destroy the economy in the short-run. Anyone with money in the market better rethink the current risk to reward.
If the matter is indeed as dire as all that, then the obvious choice is Hillary since, as Keynes so aptly observed, in the long run we're all dead.
One day Bill and Hillary were driving through Arkansas to make a campaign appearance.
They stopped at an old gas station and Bill pointed to the station manager that happened to be an old boyfriend of Hillary's.
Bill pointed to him and told Hillary...."If you had married him you would be the wife of a gas station attendant'. And Hillary turned to Bill and said 'No, he would be the husband of the first woman president.'
A guy walks into a bar and asks the bartender, "Hey - is that Trump and Pence over there?"
Yep - sure is. Go say hey; they're friendly.
Guy walks over to Trump and Pence, "Excuse me but I just wanted to say that I am a big fan of both of you. Whatcha talking about?"
Trump replies, "World War 3. We're gonna nuke 140 million Muslims and Hillary Clinton."
Guy inquires, "Why would you want to kill 140 million Muslim's?"
Trump laughs and points to Pence,.... "See, I told you no one likes that bitch."
(repost from p&r)
Goofy guy for sure, but far from incompetent, which Billary has displayed repeatedly.
Last edited:
He spent 7 years in prison for contempt. Most people spend 10 days 14 , maybe 30 days in jail for contempt.
He was setup by a malicious prosecutor. He refused to testify against Republic Bank and surrender his computer model.
He's a good guy.
His cycle of 8.6 years has some relevancy to it. It's not a hundred percent accurate but it follows a pattern.
The Forecaster was a good movie about him.
