Hillary Clinton win = what for the economy?

TOTAL BS!

Hellary is talking, "higher taxes.... more muslim savages". And Putin prefers a Trump victory as he's concerned Hellary will "throw a hissy fit and start a nuclear war." Nothing "long term gain" in any of that!
Didn't you omit something? If Hellary gets elected, what about millions and millions more rapists and murderers, really huge numbers, storming across the Mexican border, getting drivers licenses and voting to rig elections, and taking the jobs of honest hard working 'Amuricans.'
 
Last edited:
Your contortions to avoid admitting that you've done nothing to make the world a better place and that you indeed think the mistake of your birthplace makes you feel superior say far more than I ever could. Very sad.

Your rants are ridiculous. You're like a liberal version of Trump. All you do is attack people for having different beliefs and try to shame them into not falling under your code of morals.
 
Some sodium in your body is required for it to function properly. Too much can kill you. There is a relevant range that your body needs to maintain, below and above which you run into trouble. If you have no concept of relevant ranges then there is no point in continuing this exchange with you. Buh-bye.

Nah, if you take 90% from a person making $1mln a year, this is not going to kill him. It's going to rob him but he will save his life. Sounds like a great idea.
 
lmao this is what republicans actually believe
are you in denial that a substantial number of muslims are savages? are you familiar at all with the history of the Middle East since World War II or even in the past few years?
 
Nothing of what I've read disproves my point. Why not just raise taxes up to 90% of income if they are so good for the economy?
the Left takes pleasure at taxing your income. think of every 5% increase in the tax rate as eating one ice cream cone. at some point your stomach collapses. even the Left understands the ruinous nature of a 90% tax rate for the economy if there were no loopholes. however,it makes them feel good to have it on the books.
 
are you in denial that a substantial number of muslims are savages? are you familiar at all with the history of the Middle East since World War II or even in the past few years?

have you been to the mid east? have you met Muslims in person? It sounds like you're talking out of your ass, obviously there are bad ones and good ones just like with every race/religion
 
black swan events are neutral events by definition. some events inflict pain and others create pleasure. mostly they do both. it depends where you stand.
e.g. a stock meltdown is a disaster for someone about to retire but for a young person it is a wonderful opportunity to invest.

The wonders of the non-answer, very good.

So paraphrasing you are saying that pyramiding and the subsequent bipolar events are an acceptable way to run an economy.
 
Chuckle, we all deserve more than what either candidate delivered, so yes, we all do give a shit. And time was plenty available had she not constantly shot her zingers. Are you denying that the bar was set so incredibly low that Clinton looked to debate brilliantly when in reality her performance was not quite becoming of someone who wants to tackle some of the most massive issues any president has faced in the past 25 years? I am not even commenting on Trump as he failed completely from the get go. Please don't be angry, the presidency after all is all about serving people not about one person at the top. Thanks for referring me to her website, I have been there but it should not have to be necessary to have to read up on policy proposals on a website when there were 3 long debates in which she could have laid them out (the proposals) in much clearer detail. I see that it is first about winning and then performing the work but when Hilary talks about how her work is done on Nov 8 when in reality it should only start then that worries me and probably most others quite a bit.

Then read her plan on her web site if you really give a shit! Yeah, she should have spent more time on a lot of things, but time was limited, wasn't it? She actually said a lot more than The Donald.
 
Last edited:
That is all great for the poor but nowhere in your points does that benefit the middle class. The middle class works and is mostly insured and pension secured. The changes are really a drop in a bucket for the middle class which explains why she can't attract more middle class undecided potential voters. Nor has Hilary shown where the middle class wins. I am all for demanding a higher share from the rich and reallocate that to the bottom 20% or 30%. Many of the super rich actually agree with that. But there is very little for the middle class in her policy proposals.

Clinton will push for raising the cap on social security contributions as a primary way to adjust for changing demographics. This is an excellent way to adjust. She may also push for a small increase in the contribution rate. The Trustees, several years ago, were requesting a 1 cent employer/employee rate increase. Haven't looked to see if that figure has been adjusted up. I suspect it has, since Congress failed to act in a timely manner on the Trustees recommendation.

There will likely be a push to modify Obama care: On the table will be the Public option again (a step toward single payer!), and making health care access independent of employment (should have been that way to begin with). There may even be a push to repeal McCarran- Ferguson, which would be a giant leap forward.

Whether anything can be accomplished is going to depend on the make-up of the House and Senate after the election. Vote democrat if you want to see Obamacare fixed and a balanced budget. The democrats will raise taxes a small amount, a few percent probably graduated, on high income families and individuals, but not by as much as is needed. They will not raise taxes on ordinary incomes other than the possible exception of a small increase in the payroll tax. Remember that that portion of the payroll tax that goes to Social Security is, for the vast majority, an investment rather than a tax, i.e., the ROI, on average, is positive. Vote Republican if you want low taxes and more 'defense' spending, i.e., dramatically higher deficits, and eventually higher inflation and long term costs.

The democrats won't put much of a check on wasteful DOD spending and harmful, useless wars, but they will be much better at holding the defense industry in check than the Republicans. If you work for the defense industry, vote Republican, if not vote Democrat.

The democrats and Republicans will both push for immigration reform, but they won't agree on how to do it. The Republicans will block every Supreme court nominee until the exasperated Senate Majority leader changes the rules to prevent a further filibuster on court nominees. The Republicans will cry "foul." despite having left the Democrats with no choice. In this way, the Republicans, having blown their chances to agree on a less "liberal" appointee, are guaranteed to get a rotten appointee, from their perspective. Could even be a black or an Hispanic or possibly a 'communist' female.. Vote for Trump if you want to keep 'horrible' people, like women, off the court.

The Republicans will continue their scorched Earth policy and do what they can to make a mess of any democrat initiatives and legislation that might squeak through.
 
Last edited:
you didn't paraphrase me. you extrapolated something I wrote into something that has nothing to do with my way of thinking.
you also have shown a lack of understanding for a 2nd time what a black swan event is.
 
Back
Top