Well, that Trump has brought about himself. He declared war on the media and belittled journalists from the very beginning.
Hillary Clinton win = what for the economy?
- Thread starter marcoPolo21
- Start date
There isn't an excuse for it. Trump has shown how much corruption there really is in this country. Politicians, journalists, etc have an agenda to preserve the establishment.
Its not an excuse, just a simple, rational, explanation. Dont expect a whole lot of love (from most) right after you shot them in the foot.
I rather have people with an agenda. You know, it makes them kind of predictable,kind of holds them to some standard and provides some sort of continuity. A lot better than someone lambasting immigrants but employing not only immigrants but undocumented (translate: illegal) ones. I take someone with an agenda any time over a hypocrite.
I rather have people with an agenda. You know, it makes them kind of predictable,kind of holds them to some standard and provides some sort of continuity. A lot better than someone lambasting immigrants but employing not only immigrants but undocumented (translate: illegal) ones. I take someone with an agenda any time over a hypocrite.
Are you an undocumented immigrant who worked for Trump?
no but Donald himself never denied it, not in nor outside of the debates. Just in the last debate Hillary mentioned it and Donald did not deny it at all. That in addition to the records that surfaced long time ago that showed that he did in fact employ undocumented workers.
Do you realize that in order to hire illegals (undocumented) you have to pay them in cash. You think Trump corp is paying its employees in cash? Or maybe mr Trump does it himself - every month he personally pays in cash to thousands of his employees?
Last edited:
however he paid them, he hired undocumented workers and Donald knew. I did not specify how he paid them nor how many he hired, and it is completely irrelevant. You are deflecting from the issue.
Well, the devil of one's lies is in the details.
we can disagree amiably then. There is a weak spot in my arguments, but I don't believe what you highlighted is it.I was kidding. You're not on ignore with me.