The fact that the left is already all in behind Clinton only goes to show the lack of depth on the Dem bench. Who else are they going get behind, House Honkey Joe? Laughable! Plus, it's an easy campaign to run. They already have the Obama model. All they have to do is replace one word. Exchange racist for sexist and viola, it's done. Question her, you're sexist. Disagree in any way, you're sexist. Ask a tough question, you're sexist. We had to prove we're not a nation of racists, so Obama had to be elected. Now we must prove we're not a nation of sexists, so we must vote for Hillary. The left is nothing if not predictable.
Hillary beast Jeb in Florida
- Thread starter Covertibility
- Start date
Wow. The leftist indoctrination of the sheeple is farther along than I'd thought.
Nice story, but fiction. No, like righties, we'll simply vote "the lesser of two evils", i.e. any dem over any rep. I mean, if the moronic attitude, "Donald Duck would make a better president" can get general agreement, what's the harm?
You spelled that correctly.
Just trying to be fair.
You mean "just trying to troll"?
Nice story, but fiction. No, like righties, we'll simply vote "the lesser of two evils", i.e. any dem over any rep. I mean, if the moronic attitude, "Donald Duck would make a better president" can get general agreement, what's the harm?
Talk about fictional horseshit. The left is behind Clinton, it's not a lesser of two evils. All you have to do is look at the resident moonbats on this site for an example. FC claiming "Clinton would be an awesome President". Covertibility is practically in a love affair with the idea. ExGoper is thinking about switching back to heterosexuality just because of Shrillary. And please point me to any post you have ever had that is critical to Clinton.
You should have stopped typing right there rectum. Everything the captain said is true. Whether you're capable of seeing it or not.
Nice story, but fiction. No, like righties, we'll simply vote "the lesser of two evils", i.e. any dem over any rep. I mean, if the moronic attitude, "Donald Duck would make a better president" can get general agreement, what's the harm?
I guess they forgot about the parade of clowns also know as the Republican Party presidential candidates of 2012. Some of the idiots here were wanting Bachmann for president. Even harder to believe some were wanting Palin for president. Hypocrisy again from the radicals on the right. And an extreme example of no common sense. Keep kicking their ass Ricter.
So true. We had a dangerously close brush with the post-truth, "this campaign will not be dictated to by fact checkers" party.
Their anger is born of frustration. No one is very excited by their potential candidates, including themselves. But to be optimistic, perhaps a rep candidate will emerge who is sufficiently socialistic, and we of the left could consider their positions more closely, instead of default to the LOTE. Say, Donald Duck vs. Rand Paul. ; )
Except for when it's from zerohedge.
Nothing wrong with ZH. I find their cynicism most enjoyable. Part of my daily web surf. I don't, however, garner trading advice from them (or anyone else other than my charts).
I love their occasional deer-in-the-headlights and slain muppets captioned articles. Their hilarious!
Possibly the mastermind behind file-gate, and you want her in charge of the NSA? Typical progressive. Don't worry, though. No matter what she fucks up and gets questioned about, including potential Benghazi stuff coming up, it's nearly a certainty that she won't recall.