Eeewwww, you are one sick puppy.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Hillary and Obama really go at it
- Thread starter LT701
- Start date
Eeewwww, you are one sick puppy.
Thank you sir, that was the effect I was hoping to obtain.
Even with all that. In fact even it she were to get quite a bit of plastic surgery, Hillary will always look well, like "Hillary" (who do we know named Hillary that looks halfway decent?) and so...the response we get even if she were to get a massive "overhaul" is
Eeeewwwwwwww!
Now top that off with the fact that the woman doesn't know shit about the economy or how to run government, and you have it all in front of you.....
I say vote for anyone else...Just make sure to vote.
Thanks
Steve
Even with all that. In fact even it she were to get quite a bit of plastic surgery, Hillary will always look well, like "Hillary" (who do we know named Hillary that looks halfway decent?) and so...the response we get even if she were to get a massive "overhaul" is
Eeeewwwwwwww!
Now top that off with the fact that the woman doesn't know shit about the economy or how to run government, and you have it all in front of you.....
I say vote for anyone else...Just make sure to vote.
Thanks
Steve
Quote from steve46:
I say vote for anyone else...Just make sure to vote.
Quote from flytiger:
where do I get the bumper sticker?
NOOOOOOOOOO..... vote Ron Paul. McCain is a criminal. he is pure scum.. maybe one of the worst offenders. a traitor.. a benedict arnold. Hillary is bad too.. they all are except Ron Paul and Kucinich (although i hate some of Dennis' positions).
Ron Paul was one of four Congressmen that wrote Cox asking for changes to prevent illegal naked shorting 2 months ago. wake the fk up people this is getting real serious.
http://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-19-07/s71907-330.pdf
"...Specifically, we ask the Commission to begin a rule-making process and solicit comments on regulations revising Regulation SHO to (1) require a firm location of shares to be borrowed before a short sale can be executed, and (2) enable transparency in this area by mandating timely disclosure of the volume of failures-to-deliver shares of companies on the Regulation SHO threshold list. These are among the changes to Regulation SHO that the US. Chamber of Commerce urged the Commission to consider in comments dated September 13, 2006 and January 23, 2007. Other notable commentators also have requested these amendments...."
Quote from ratboy88:
NOOOOOOOOOO..... vote Ron Paul. McCain is a criminal. he is pure scum.. maybe one of the worst offenders. a traitor.. a benedict arnold. Hillary is bad too.. they all are except Ron Paul and Kucinich (although i hate some of Dennis' positions).
Ron Paul was one of four Congressmen that wrote Cox asking for changes to prevent illegal naked shorting 2 months ago. wake the fk up people this is getting real serious.
http://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-19-07/s71907-330.pdf
"...Specifically, we ask the Commission to begin a rule-making process and solicit comments on regulations revising Regulation SHO to (1) require a firm location of shares to be borrowed before a short sale can be executed, and (2) enable transparency in this area by mandating timely disclosure of the volume of failures-to-deliver shares of companies on the Regulation SHO threshold list. These are among the changes to Regulation SHO that the US. Chamber of Commerce urged the Commission to consider in comments dated September 13, 2006 and January 23, 2007. Other notable commentators also have requested these amendments...."
I presume he makes an exception for his constituents, you know, like he does for earmarks for his constituents in spending bills? lol
Quote from ilikefox es:
I presume he makes an exception for his constituents, you know, like he does for earmarks for his constituents in spending bills? lol
he votes against the earmarks, nice try jr. the govt steals his constituents money... they are just trying to get back what was theirs to begin with.
i notice you didn't touch the illegal naked shorting topic. LOL LOL LOL dumbass!
Quote from ratboy88:
he votes against the earmarks, nice try jr. the govt steals his constituents money... they are just trying to get back what was theirs to begin with.
i notice you didn't touch the illegal naked shorting topic. LOL LOL LOL dumbass!
Yes, he voted against the earmarks for his constituents that HE PUT IN THE BILL. (which, as everyone knew, would pass) This is laughingstock stuff, bro!
Ah, yes, the illegal naked shorting topic. I presume that the RON PAUL newsletter will point out that it is specifically blacks and jews that he is targeting. Of course, Paul will say that he doesn't edit the newsletter that is printed under his name. roflmao!
Quote from LT701:
not if it's mccain, i stay home
dems told me i had to vote for kerry against bush
i didnt
reps tell me i have to vote mccain or guliani against hillary, i wont, even though i cant stand her
Same here. At least Hillary doesn't backstab her own party's core supporters. Plus, she is less likely to bungle us into pointless wars than McCain. Her experience in extensive corruption at both the state and federal level has given her a more nuanced understanding of the economy than McCain, whose understanding of financial matters is limited to marrying money and jumping when charley Keating snapped his fingers.
Quote from steve46:
... .
Even with all that. In fact even it she were to get quite a bit of plastic surgery, Hillary will always look well, like "Hillary" (who do we know named Hillary that looks halfway decent?) and so...the response we get even if she were to get a massive "overhaul" is
... .
Thanks
Steve
She has already had more facial surgery than Joan Rivers. Just compare her Arkansas pics to her today.
She should also make sure that CNN never again uses that shot from behind the candidates during a debate. Defintely not her good side.