Yep. It may surprise you to learn this but it's possible for someone to write a book on what they should do, yet still not have the self-discipline to do it. It would be a good essay topic for the class: What did he get right and where did he go wrong?"Rich Dad Poor Dad", you mean the book written by Robert Kiyosaki...the guy who filed for chapter 7 bankruptcy in 2012 after earning more than $45 million in royalties? That "Rich Dad, Poor Dad"?
In other news, JK Rowling has no magical abilities and Tom Clancy never served in the military.
Aside from the questionable concept of taking financial advise from a financial failure, there are a couple of inherent assumptions you make that I've pointed out to you before but you seem to fail to internalize. First, while you may believe that wealth is a worthy end in and of itself, a big chunk of the rest of the world doesn't share that view.
First, you don't know me. Second, that's the kind of fashionable drivel that socialists like to say right up to the point that the decide they actually do need something.
Everyone needs food, shelter, etc. How many people would turn down a free house because that's "wealth" and "wealth" isn't important to them?
I value experience, you value the pile of money when you die. Again, neither of us is "right".
A little full of yourself much? I gave the example of someone who invests 90% just as a simple example, to contrast against those who take no responsibility for their financial future and risk becoming a burden on their neighbours. I didn't say everyone should be forced to do it, what I did say is that stealing from that person to pay someone else much less responsible is evil.
Who are you and I to say a poor person shouldn't be allowed to choose to have experiences with any extra money they have rather than building wealth?
I'm a responsible adult who gives a damn, that's who. It's very fashionable these days to just tell people to do whatever they feel like at that particular moment with no consideration of the long term consequences. It takes a lot more courage and integrity to tell someone something they might not want to hear.
Furthermore, I'm not saying they shouldn't be allowed to make their own choices with their own money, I'm just saying that it's wrong to force everyone else to pay for them.
Here's the real kicker though, because I led a broad and rich life, I was able to start two successful businesses after I left the service and now have significantly more wealth than I would have been able to save in 100 lifetimes of living a miserly existence while putting 90% of my disposable income into savings.
Because you have a military pension, which guarantees you have an income for the rest of your life, you mean. Of course you can spend more of your income on "experiences" if your retirement is already secured. It also allows you to take much larger risks with the stability of your day to day income.
I'm guessing you're young.
Wrong. Try reading what I actually wrote instead of inventing strawman arguments and making gross generalizations to highlight your various prejudices.
You probably haven't internalized yet that most reasonably fit 25 year olds can hike Kilimanjaro almost on a whim where as only a few 75 year olds can even do it at all after and then only after careful preparation. By the time you're that age, huge swaths of experiences you could have had at any time from 20-65 are completely beyond reach, no matter how much money you have. And that's not even taking into account the fact that you can't do a party sailing trip with a bunch of 20 year olds in Croatia when you're 40 even if you're physically able to, many experiences are age appropriate and you only have one window to do them. I hope you don't end up at the age you realize your own mortality before you start to seriously think about what your pile of money is actually getting you versus the alternative.
Or I realize it's possible to take an enjoyable hike without flying to Africa to do it. A weekend out backpacking with your friends can cost as little or as much as you want it to.
Obviously you can afford it so good for you. If you can't, consider the Appalachian Trail or the PCT.
I threw a nice bachelor party for myself sailing for a weekend and spent almost nothing. Guys with boats like to sail. I knew a guy who knew a guy, and next thing we're having a great weekend.
If you can't afford it, you're most likely not doing yourself any favours by saying "it's an experience" and doing it anyways.
In my "experience" there are people who use the whole "it's about the experience" thing, are often using that as an excuse for poor financial discipline.
If you want to fill you passport with stamps and see the world, joining the military and doing it on uncle sam's dime may be a very smart way to do it. Taking on five or six figures of credit card debt while zeroing our your savings? Not so much.
It's actually kind of funny that you see yourself as an argument against this, as a military career is a huge exercise in self discipline and delayed financial gratification.

