You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
High School Student, Forbidden From Wearing Rosary For His Grandma
- Thread starter Banjo
- Start date
what an out of context lie. You are a complete fraud, troll, liar.
show us the quote in which hawking says a the boundry proposal can account for all the complicated structures around us an it not be part of a multiverse. I just explained the eternal inflation models to you. Now you are lying about what Hawking is saying.
You and your sock puppets (ex. ricter) choose to be dense. Its sort of funny.
show us the quote in which hawking says a the boundry proposal can account for all the complicated structures around us an it not be part of a multiverse. I just explained the eternal inflation models to you. Now you are lying about what Hawking is saying.
You and your sock puppets (ex. ricter) choose to be dense. Its sort of funny.
Quote from stu:
....what a load of dribble.
Not the multiverse, not a megaverse but the universe and ".. the no boundary proposal, can account for all the complicated structure that we see around us." Stephen Hawking
That's what the man said.
Neither is he arguing against string theory. He's showing how his proposals could help it become falsifiable.
"That multiverse idea is not a notion invented to account for the miracle of fine tuning. It is a consequence predicted by many theories in modern cosmology" Stephen Hawking
So much for your so called "speculative pseudo science"
In your quest for a god where none belongs you've grabbed the wrong end of the stick as usual.
Educate yourself first.
Quote from jem:
this is an example of my cut an pasting.
One of the finest mines in science telling you that -- of course there is fine tuning.
you e leftists clowns are so fricken ignorant (except for ricter) or filled with lies... you try and pretend this is not the state of science. Just about every scientists in the world concurs there is fine tuning or at least the appearance.
No they don't. That would mean a tuner. Just about every relevant scientist is an atheist.
Quote from stu:
nah. Jem's cut and pasting , poor rhetoric, bad spelling and copious amounts of general abuse ..... smart? really?
Hmmm, now that you mention it, his spelling is pretty bad and his logic is out to lunch. That much is evident from my talks with him about GW. Well he's tenacious anyway. And if it weren't for him things would be pretty dull around here.
you are so emotional you do not even understand what is happening in science even though I spoon feed it to you.
Go back and read the quote from Bernard Carr.
Or read the quotes from the Hawking paper.
Or understand Susskind.
The scientists state our one universe appears fine tuned..however, they hold out hope the tunings can be explained. Right now most are hoping that we someday find out we live in a multiverse.
But, yes the some scientists, including hawking are brave enough to admit that it does appear as if tuned by an outside agency if you go with traditional approaches.
Go back and read the quote from Bernard Carr.
Or read the quotes from the Hawking paper.
Or understand Susskind.
The scientists state our one universe appears fine tuned..however, they hold out hope the tunings can be explained. Right now most are hoping that we someday find out we live in a multiverse.
But, yes the some scientists, including hawking are brave enough to admit that it does appear as if tuned by an outside agency if you go with traditional approaches.
Quote from futurecurrents:
No they don't. That would mean a tuner. Just about every relevant scientist is an atheist.
First I suggest you stop being so angry and defensive all the time and answer a question I asked you way back. You actually haven't "explained the eternal inflation models" to me or anyone lol, so just deal with one thing at a time.Quote from jem:
what an out of context lie. You are a complete fraud, troll, liar.
show us the quote in which hawking says a the boundry proposal can account for all the complicated structures around us an it not be part of a multiverse. I just explained the eternal inflation models to you. Now you are lying about what Hawking is saying.
You and your sock puppets (ex. ricter) choose to be dense. Its sort of funny.
What do you imagine multiverse is? Let me help you with it.
Are you picturing endless universes like this one or something different?
What do you think multiverse means when you keep saying it?
or can't you even manage that?
yep, a convenient distraction. But way past the end of his repertoire on this subject I'd say.Quote from futurecurrents:
Hmmm, now that you mention it, his spelling is pretty bad and his logic is out to lunch. That much is evident from my talks with him about GW. Well he's tenacious anyway. And if it weren't for him things would be pretty dull around here.
Maybe his tenacity will keep him going for while longer with GW, but inevitably he'll probably just start getting more and more angry with that too. He's chasing himself around in ever decreasing circles here, repeating the same bullshit a million times, ignoring most all refutation, as if doing so changed the ways in which he's wrong.
Forums eh..who'd join 'em.