All those stocks you mentioned, along with a few dozen others going back to the early 2000's (ENE, WCOM, ERIC, etc.) did trade in the same way as C. The only difference is all those symbols, just like ALU, S, SIRI, etc. today, didn't trade volume even remotely close to that of C. So yes, traders will move onto other symbols, but it "will never be the same." C was one of those once in a lifetime opportunities. I think most of us who trade it for a living knew that sooner or later it would come to an end...
I'll be taking a slightly different approach and starting a petition against the Citigroup reverse split.
I'll be taking a slightly different approach and starting a petition against the Citigroup reverse split.
Quote from EPrado:
You do make good points...float is obviously huge. Right now S or ALU aren't even close to it. But once C splits it is possible that all these guys go elsewhere. They aren't gonna just stop trading. If you get enough traders involved they can turn another low priced stock into a C type trade. I don't think you can really compare the likes of ALU and S right now to what they might become when C splits. These guys have moved before...AIG...FNM...FRE...I guess we'll see in the beginning of May.
What these guys should do is just load up on puts on C....stock is gonna get clobbered when it splits. You can't turn a crap bank into a good bank by changing the price.