Once again you troll your ass off.. your cover up for your tremendously stupid mistake is the elegantly specious argument we expect from you.
1. My link cited the economist article. Had you not been lying your ass off you might have read it. Here is the key... try reading the first sentence... "says The Economist magazine" and cites the article...
here is the quote...
"The discovery," says The Economist magazine, "puts the finishing flourish on the Standard Model, the best explanation to date for how the universe worksâexcept in the domain of gravity, which is governed by the general theory of relativity" ("The Higgs Boson: Gotcha!" July 7, 2012, p. 71).
Of the 17 particles the theory predicted, 16 had been found. But it took decades and billions of dollars invested in the Large Hadron Collider, a 17-mile circular tunnel on the border of Switzerland and France, to finally pin down this last particleâthe Higgs boson.
What is also remarkable is the precision of the calculations behind the discovery. The constants of the universe, the very laws governing physics as we know it, can be stated in mathematical equations to the point where the approximate location and mass of the Higgs boson were found. Yet elation has given way to a reluctant admissionâand thoughts of throwing out what's been found.
As The Economist explains: "One problem [with the Higgs discovery] is that, as it stands, the [Standard] model requires its 20 or so constants to be exactly what they are to an uncomfortable 32 decimal places . Insert different values and the upshot is nonsensical predictions, like phenomena occurring with a likelihood of more than 100%" (p. 72, emphasis added throughout).
http://www.ucg.org/science/god-science-and-bible-higgs-boson-evidence-universes-fine-tuning/
2. not only were you wrong but you lied about science...
Stu... quote...
"to make a flawed conclusion...."the standard model of the universe can be used to predict where the Higgs Boson would show up... and that therefore many of the constants of the universe are tuned to 20 or more decimal places. " (=3).
Higgs is predicted in the Standard Model. Nothing to do with constants' 20 decimal places or more, but confirmation of how particles get mass."
but then here is the quote from the Economist...
http://www.economist.com/node/21558248
"The constant gardener
One problem is that, as it stands, the model requires its 20 or so constants to be exactly what they are to an uncomfortable 32 decimal places. Insert different values and the upshot is nonsensical predictions, like phenomena occurring with a likelihood of more than 100%.
Nature could, of course, turn out to be this fastidious. But physicists have learned to take the need for such fine-tuning, as the precision fiddling is known in the argot, as a sign that something important is missing from their picture of the world."
Stu you were wrong about the science again.
You lied your ass off with no regard for whether the constants are to 20 decimal places or not.
I catch you in lies about science in just about every exchange we have. thread.
Quote from stu:
The link in that opening "statement" of yours is to a religious website called The Good News, NOT The Economist.
The Good News is ...'the biblically based flagship publication of the United Church of God'
http://www.ucg.org/science/god-scie...es-fine-tuning/ ...your link.
You made NO link to the Economist before you posted this flawed assertion.....
"I provided an article which showed the finding of Higgs Boson shows that the standard model of the universe can be used to predict where the Higgs Boson would show up... and that therefore many of the constants of the universe are tuned to 20 or more decimal places."
So.... "once again we see proof you will bullshit"
What The Economist does say is...
"The discovery of the boson, then, is rightly hailed as the crowning achievement of one of history's most successful scientific theories. But it is also almost certainly the beginning of that theory's undoing, and its replacement by something better. In science, with its constant search for the truth, this is something to celebrate."
The Standard Model will evolve.
All your arguments if they can even be called that, are bogus. 2+2 = 3. They always have been.
Higgs does not mean 20 or more decimal places. Bogus, as your 2+2=3 'random chance' claims are bogus.
You won't know what you're being taught when you can do little more than keep distortorting it to make groundless conclusions based only on what you want to believe.
