ny times article too; OP clearly a reactionary troll.I read the article over on VoA you linked, and apparently you did not. That whole article goes into detail about how the theory got started, and why it is veritably false.
ny times article too; OP clearly a reactionary troll.I read the article over on VoA you linked, and apparently you did not. That whole article goes into detail about how the theory got started, and why it is veritably false.
Clearly the only perspective you have taken into consideration is that of your own. If you post articles with misleading headlines on this website and other members call you out on it and then report it to me for review... and then I agree with their assessment of the content you posted based upon my 26 years of experience in reviewing posts, I want you to understand one thing:It's impolite and very disrespectful to delete a posting,
we don't use artificial intelligence to review posts here at Elite Trader.
Having reviewed this Thread, I can say I agree with The Great Overnight, again. How good is Overnight!I read the article over on VoA you linked, and apparently you did not. That whole article goes into detail about how the theory got started, and why it is veritably false.
Here's the link without your misleading headline from that now-deleted thread.
https://www.voanews.com/a/fact-chec...onspiracy-theory-about-maui-fire/7278075.html
So you claim you want to post "anti-US" stuff in politics, but use a source that is funded by the US Government itself. That's rich.
You're just not very good at that whole anti-US-conspiracy thing, so don't try it any longer.
Give the link.
In this Politics board as well in my content it's missing.
Being disrespectful startet by that person who deleted my posting silently and w/o any notice. He provoked me for namecalling him.
I just copied the file to the tmp folder for making screenshot etc. The original is in a deep subdir named "ET_censorship" or so...![]()
Just a question:Clearly the only perspective you have taken into consideration is that of your own. If you post articles with misleading headlines on this website and other members call you out on it and then report it to me for review... and then I agree with their assessment of the content you posted based upon my 26 years of experience in reviewing posts, I want you to understand one thing:
What you posted is not acceptable here. And if you feel like it's impolite or disrespectful in any way, I don't care.

Just a question:
So are you meaning the title of the thread I used ("Hawaiian wildfires set by US") was wrong?
Would it have been acceptable when I added a question mark to it? Ie.
"Hawaiian wildfires set by US ?"
FYI: after researching the issue further I'm convinced the fires were set intentionally by the US. So what do you say now? And: the whole issue is still investigated by the US authorities, so then how can you be sure that it was not as claimed? You can't :
"Perhaps not everyone knows that AFRL, the Air Force Research Laboratory Directed Energy Directorate, is present in Maui Air Force Maui Optical and Supercomputing (AMOS) Site. Suppose that at the start date of the fires, indeed at the precise moment of this start, a new type of directed energy weapon was being tested at this installation [...]"
Let me tell you this: the postings of users are the users intellectual property. You don't have the right to silently delete their postings. By such actions you are cancelling opinions ("cancel culture") and manipulating the public discussion.
And answer this: normally an off-topic thread gets moved to Chit-Chat. Why was it not done in that case? This indicates that you got orders from "above"... Poor slave of the injust bigbrother system...![]()