Hey Moderator a$$, why have you deleted my posting here in Politics?

I read the article over on VoA you linked, and apparently you did not. That whole article goes into detail about how the theory got started, and why it is veritably false.
ny times article too; OP clearly a reactionary troll.
 
It's impolite and very disrespectful to delete a posting,
Clearly the only perspective you have taken into consideration is that of your own. If you post articles with misleading headlines on this website and other members call you out on it and then report it to me for review... and then I agree with their assessment of the content you posted based upon my 26 years of experience in reviewing posts, I want you to understand one thing:

What you posted is not acceptable here. And if you feel like it's impolite or disrespectful in any way, I don't care.

This is not Twitter / X, nor is it Facebook or Instagram or LinkedIn. So whatever you might get away with on other sites with no issues won't fly here because unlike so many of the aforementioned sites, we don't use artificial intelligence to review posts here at Elite Trader. We use real human intelligence. And based upon the feedback on your post from real members with real human intelligence, they think what you posted was complete garbage, and I agree with them.

As Overnight stated, I don't even think you read the entire article that you referenced because the article you posted actually contradicted the title that you gave to your own thread.

Grow the fuck up dude. Your bullshit post in an unmoderated forum was so bad that it still got deleted. Deal with it.
 
Last edited:
we don't use artificial intelligence to review posts here at Elite Trader.

Mmm hmmm, sure...

magna.jpg


He never laughs, too. A sure sign.
 
I read the article over on VoA you linked, and apparently you did not. That whole article goes into detail about how the theory got started, and why it is veritably false.

Here's the link without your misleading headline from that now-deleted thread.

https://www.voanews.com/a/fact-chec...onspiracy-theory-about-maui-fire/7278075.html

So you claim you want to post "anti-US" stuff in politics, but use a source that is funded by the US Government itself. That's rich.

You're just not very good at that whole anti-US-conspiracy thing, so don't try it any longer.
Having reviewed this Thread, I can say I agree with The Great Overnight, again. How good is Overnight!
 
Being disrespectful startet by that person who deleted my posting silently and w/o any notice. He provoked me for namecalling him.

I just copied the file to the tmp folder for making screenshot etc. The original is in a deep subdir named "ET_censorship" or so... :)

IMG_5347.png
 
Clearly the only perspective you have taken into consideration is that of your own. If you post articles with misleading headlines on this website and other members call you out on it and then report it to me for review... and then I agree with their assessment of the content you posted based upon my 26 years of experience in reviewing posts, I want you to understand one thing:

What you posted is not acceptable here. And if you feel like it's impolite or disrespectful in any way, I don't care.
Just a question:
So are you meaning the title of the thread I used ("Hawaiian wildfires set by US") was wrong?
Would it have been acceptable when I added a question mark to it? Ie.
"Hawaiian wildfires set by US ?"

FYI: after researching the issue further I'm convinced the fires were set intentionally by the US. So what do you say now? And: the whole issue is still investigated by the US authorities, so then how can you be sure that it was not as claimed? You can't :

"Perhaps not everyone knows that AFRL, the Air Force Research Laboratory Directed Energy Directorate, is present in Maui Air Force Maui Optical and Supercomputing (AMOS) Site. Suppose that at the start date of the fires, indeed at the precise moment of this start, a new type of directed energy weapon was being tested at this installation [...]"


Let me tell you this: the postings of users are the users intellectual property. You don't have the right to silently delete their postings. By such actions you are cancelling opinions ("cancel culture") and manipulating the public discussion.

And answer this: normally an off-topic thread gets moved to Chit-Chat. Why was it not done in that case? This indicates that you got orders from "above"... Poor slave of the injust & corrupt bigbrother system... :)
 
Last edited:
Just a question:
So are you meaning the title of the thread I used ("Hawaiian wildfires set by US") was wrong?
Would it have been acceptable when I added a question mark to it? Ie.
"Hawaiian wildfires set by US ?"

FYI: after researching the issue further I'm convinced the fires were set intentionally by the US. So what do you say now? And: the whole issue is still investigated by the US authorities, so then how can you be sure that it was not as claimed? You can't :

"Perhaps not everyone knows that AFRL, the Air Force Research Laboratory Directed Energy Directorate, is present in Maui Air Force Maui Optical and Supercomputing (AMOS) Site. Suppose that at the start date of the fires, indeed at the precise moment of this start, a new type of directed energy weapon was being tested at this installation [...]"


Let me tell you this: the postings of users are the users intellectual property. You don't have the right to silently delete their postings. By such actions you are cancelling opinions ("cancel culture") and manipulating the public discussion.

And answer this: normally an off-topic thread gets moved to Chit-Chat. Why was it not done in that case? This indicates that you got orders from "above"... Poor slave of the injust bigbrother system... :)

move to russia and be a free man there - idiot.
 
Back
Top