Boxes have been in London, Europe, Russia and Asia for quite a while... Welcome to 2005 broQuote from stock777:
hft SCUM leaking into other Countries as they seek to vibrate additional profits by jumping in front of YOUR next trade.
I pay for E*Trade quotes but E*Trade does not provide data from all ECNs. I'd like the ECNs that E*Trade does not pay for/broadcast to close so that everyone will be equal.Quote from johnnyqpublic:
I do not even have real-time quotes enabled on my E*Trade account, because they cost extra, and thus I am not in favor of anyone else receiving real-time quotes, either.
Or L2 quotes. Heaven forbid.
I've asked you very directly in this thread - 5 times - with no answer from you. I'll make it 6 times....Quote from stock777:
When you get your head out of your sphincter , we'll talk.
Quote from WinstonTJ:
I've asked you very directly in this thread - 5 times - with no answer from you. I'll make it 6 times....
To make things 'fair' how would you equalize delay of data from the pit to the furthest remote trader?
Quote from johnnyqpublic:
How would this address equalizing data delay?
Quote from risktaker:
Admit it, over the last 3-4 years, the SEC and the US exchanges introduced rules that favor those with close proximity/co-located in the exchanges. They also removed barriers that used to be in place that slowed these systems down. They usually do in the name of benefitting 'the little guy'.

Quote from johnnyqpublic:
(emphasis mine)
Since the rest of your argument depends on this statement presented as fact, I would like a citation/reference, please.![]()

Quote from risktaker:
pattern daytrader rule was their 1st attempt at getting rid of the little guy.
Since that was obviously not sufficient, they came up with more...
Removal of the uptick rule. (hi speed systems now don't need to check/wait which stock is shortable or not).
Reg NMS. (HFT's now don't need to spend precious milliseconds filtering inferior quotes and it makes it a lot easier to keep the little guy out).
Quote from johnnyqpublic:
Furthermore, your implicit definition of the uptick rule is just plain wrong.