Hey Democrats, you want wage increases? How about applying the principles of free market economics.

Just to sidetrack a bit...but here we are 8 years into ZIRP, the recovery has been anemic at best (mostly a massive asset reflation scheme)...There has been alot of "stealth inflation" since 2008, but don't expect to see those numbers anywhere (just do your own due diligence and you'll find it)...So, the common man has been completely decimated by an economy that has not replaced decent paying jobs and is forced to take on a measly hourly wage job, or a bartender/waitress economy style job...probably quite a few "commission only" jobs as well...

So if we are 8 years into this "recovery" and the Fed has done its best to eliminate the "peak's and trough's" of the economic cycle, it's just a matter of time before we are headlong into another recession, but this time with a whole host of $15/hr employees...Guess what? They're gone. Then we'll have another massive influx of out of work individuals back on public assistance...I can see what the govt has attempted to do with this mandatory wage hike..shift the burden off of the govt, but they do not have the economic growth required to make this work. It's fitting a square peg into a round hole and they know it. Bottomline: this will just accelerate the shedding of jobs the next go round.
 
You've been making the anti-Walmart argument this entire thread..(i.e. big business not paying employees enough to get off of public assistance)...
Again, it's the practices rather than the size of the business to which I take exception. Please don't draw the wrong conclusion simply because they can, and perhaps more than just sometimes do, converge.
 
der_kommissar, you seem to have a big issue with minimum wages going up but have not mentioned anything about executive compensation being syphoned out of companies. The disparity between executive pay and average wages has never been higher. Never. You think maybe there might be something worth exploring there? Seriously, I cannot see how anyone can defend someone making an outsized income in large part by squeezing the little guy for all he's worth. You'd think "management" would be a bit more dynamic than that.
 
Back
Top