I don't think we're going to reach an agreement here. Don't ask me how I know; I just sense these things. 


Not if one of the parties had stated from the beginning that they were going to oppose everything the president wanted. See also: Supreme Court nominations.If there were cost measures in the bill, the ACA would have received some bi-partisan support.
I don't think we're going to reach an agreement here. Don't ask me how I know; I just sense these things.![]()
When gov't sticks its nose where it doesn't belong, like between an employee and an employer in the private sector, the business has an incentive to just close down the plant and move production offshore to friendlier locales. And then set up an offshore company in the bvi to hold the profits tax free of the US Goobermint. Oh, wow. I just realized. That's exactly what they are doing.
Good.
You never answered my question. And I know why. It's because there is only one rational answer, and you can't bring yourself to be rational, because it would be an admission that your position is wrong.
Obviously, real estate prices play a role, fueled in part by foreign investment. Here in Canada, there is a fairly sizeable disconnect between wages and real estate prices, particularly in larger cities. Monetary policy isn't helping.Again, why are we seeing record rent increases in a stagnant, no wage growth economy?
Nothing is more "business friendly" than an amenable Third World country. Is that the kind of business environment makeover you're looking for in the US?but as we've seen, when given the options businesses flee high tax, overly regulated locales in favor of more business friendly climates.
This is very general. A living wage for a single person is different than a living wage for a family of four (or larger). Approximately what rate per hour do you think is appropriate?How's this: Any full-time job should at least provide a living wage. Period. People should not have to have more than one full-time job just to make ends meet for basic living needs. You want families to spend more time together so that they can raise their children to have a better chance of leading productive lives? Well, this might be a good place to start.
Your turn.
Your statement is false.Not if one of the parties had stated from the beginning that they were going to oppose everything the president wanted. See also: Supreme Court nominations.