Just for the sake of argument, Jem. Let's say every one can choose there sexual preference and that choice has nothing to do with DNA, "would that be wrong in your opinion?" I guess my question is basically the same as asking whether you think it is wrong for a person to identify with a sex opposite to their biological sex, when there is no known gene causing them to do this.but thats the thing its not who they are its what they choose to do and then share the details.
There is a distinction. Most people can't really change their race... people can choose to share or not to share their sexual preferences. When and if they really discover a gay gene... I will amend this statement to those who have the gay gene.
and then on top of that...
in the America I would prefer to live in... people can choose to be gay and people can choose who they make cakes for. If I were a baker I would have no problem making cake for gay people. I would just sell the little figurines separately if I had a problem placing the figurines. But that is me and that would be my choice. If someone else makes another choice... I say leave them the hell alone or tell your friends not to do business with them.
Don' t use the govt to mess with them.
Obviously I am not asking about gay people here, but transgender.
Let me assume you think it is wrong. Then my next question is, "Because you think it is wrong for a transgender person to identify with the opposite biological sex, would you then want, a transgender person in a dress and high heels and long hair and with a female voice, and appearing to at least a casual observer to be a female, to use the mens' restroom?