Hershey's Equity thread

[gotta_trade]

Quote from bubba7:



2. We will trade a range of floats only: 5 to 30 million shares.

Jack,

On the bottom of page 3 you mentioned the above step.

Some of the stocks on our list do not meet that criteria.

At this time, is the float a consideration?

Thanks,
gotta_trade

 

[izeickl]

My gainers from list 1 that meet the requirement (if im doing it correctly).

 

[nononsense]

Quote from Scientist:

I don't lie.
I've actually got some good relations to the moderators, and I get them to delete your posts all the time - You didn't notice? ~THE Scientist

That is exactly what happened to 2 pages in the "Is it really an Edge?" Thread.

dbphoenix has nothing to do with this but he wrote:
"Not much point in my trying to rebut an excerpted quote from a post that has been deleted (along with nearly every other post I've made on random entry)."

you scientist wrote:
"Agree. There's enough left after all the deletions to answer the questions I think."
You left only what you thought to be convenient.

Pointless to have any further dealings with you unless you restore ALL postings that you made disappear as you told us in the above quote - not only mine but also yours. If it arranges you, you do indeed restore posts. I have never encountered such a shameless character! Don't tell us you keep up relations with the Queen of Denmark! Preposterous!

nononsense

 

[electron]

Quote from Scientist:

25 pages already. Not a bad pace for day 1, Jack

Yes, if quantity were the only consideration in this business, or any other for that matter, that would be some good point. In case you are not aware of it, there is also another thing to consider. It's called quality. That's the thing that makes some people feel 'safe' or unsafe depending on whether you have it or not.

We, the sceptics, are still waiting for that quality thing...

 

[Scientist]

Quote from nononsense:That is exactly what happened to 2 pages in the "Is it really an Edge?" Thread.

What the heaven are you on about?

The deletions of the 2 pages were none of my business. You're so full of thought-up nonsense. You realize I was joking?

dbphoenix has nothing to do with this but he wrote:
"Not much point in my trying to rebut an excerpted quote from a post that has been deleted (along with nearly every other post I've made on random entry)."

you scientist wrote:
"Agree. There's enough left after all the deletions to answer the questions I think."
You left only what you thought to be convenient.

Regarding the quote of dbphoenix : I was actually on HIS side in that argument. I said there should still be enough left after inandlong's deletions (most of which were yours, anyway), and phoenix even agreed. The argument was between phoenix & me vs inandlong, regarding something you don't even understand : trading. You were just the "annoying bystander", as you're everywhere these days. You're losing the plot now. Do you want me to get dbphoenix or inandlong to verify this?

Pointless to have any further dealings with you unless you restore ALL postings that you made disappear as you told us in the above quote - not only mine but also yours. If it arranges you, you do indeed restore posts. I have never encountered such a shameless character! Don't tell us you keep up relations with the Queen of Denmark! Preposterous!

nononsense [/B]

"Left what I thought to be convenient" ??? "Restore postings I made disappear" ... ??? "Restore my own posts"??? "Shameless character"??? "Relations with the Queen of Denmark"???

None of this even makes sense. It's psychotic gibberish, you are aware of that? Anybody with a brain can see that - hello?

You do realize that only moderators can do any of that stuff - don't you?

nononsense, this is not funny anymore. Clearly you lost the match, but I didn't expect you'd also lose the plot so seriously. You're starting to get psychotic and it's very scary. Anybody else here can see this just reading your last (or previous) post. If you can't see that yourself, you should realize that you need professional help. It's probably really necessary, or you'll go down the gully man.

The next post of this kind, and you'll be the first guy on my ignore list. I hope you change to the better a little. Do not pollute ET any further - please.

Peace. Look after yourself, brother. Take it easy. Take some time off.
~The Scientist

 

[Scientist]

Quote from electron:
Yes, if quantity were the only consideration in this business, or any other for that matter, that would be some good point. In case you are not aware of it, there is also another thing to consider. It's called quality. That's the thing that makes some people feel 'safe' or unsafe depending on whether you have it or not.

We, the sceptics, are still waiting for that quality thing...

I'm not getting your point, brother electron.

Quality / Quantity - It doesn't matter. Only you yourself can most objectively evaluate that. If you don't, then that's probably due to laziness or lack of objectivity. You want it the "easy way" by live demonstrations etc - But you'd still be no step ahead because you wouldn't know how it works. So why bother?

If you know enough about trading, there should be no reason for you to feel safe / unsafe at all. You're free to evaluate these techniques via papertrading, i.e. clearstation portfolios, as others do on here.

If you're unsure - Papertrade. Don't worry about "safe" or "unsafe". If you know your stuff, there shouldn't be reason to feel "unsafe". If you don't, then you shouldn't be trading anyway. It's as simple as that. You're free to evaluate and implement whatever seems suitable to you and dump the rest at your discretion. You've got nothing to lose and everything to gain! Does that make any sense?
Just don't give the author a hard time, please.

I hope this helped a little. Good luck with your papertrading!

All the Best,
~Scientist

 

[izeickl]

Quote from Scientist:

I'm not getting your point, brother electron.

Quality / Quantity - It doesn't matter. Only you yourself can most objectively evaluate that. If you don't, then that's probably due to laziness or lack of objectivity. You want it the "easy way" by live demonstrations etc - But you'd still be no step ahead because you wouldn't know how it works. So why bother?

If you know enough about trading, there should be no reason for you to feel safe / unsafe at all. You're free to evaluate these techniques via papertrading, i.e. clearstation portfolios, as others do on here.

If you're unsure - Papertrade. Don't worry about "safe" or "unsafe". If you know your stuff, there shouldn't be reason to feel "unsafe". If you don't, then you shouldn't be trading anyway. It's as simple as that. You're free to evaluate and implement whatever seems suitable to you and dump the rest at your discretion. You've got nothing to lose and everything to gain! Does that make any sense? Just don't give the author a hard time, please.

I hope this helped a little. Good luck with your papertrading!

All the Best,
~Scientist

Just wanna say Ditto.
Most of the pages has come from the likes of me asking questions and people flaming and having arguments. Not Jacks fault. Its costing me nothing but time and patience but with potential rewards, Jack is giving up his time for us for nothing in return.

 

[dkm]

hi nkhoi, how you doing?

I'm keeping an eye on this thread for old time's sake

Regards

David
http://groups.msn.com/ShortTermStockTrading/general.msnw?pgmarket=en-us

 

[iceman1]

Quote from nononsense:

Dear Iceman,

I fully understand your incomprehension. Indeed all of this is preposterous and your are probably as perplexed by this as I was reading all this yesterday.

Maybe your advise would have been wiser. I can tell you that I never encountered such an extravagant address in my life before and I can assure you that I will never reply to this "elite" fellow again.

I simply felt compelled to write an answer to this. As to Jack's things, he may have one follower, 100 followers or 10,000 followers. This should not stand in the way of people to challenge him, especially with his pretentious attitude to some posters. We'll see him at work in a few days. This is my sole motive. Let us finally keep him to some standards better than smoke.

In fact, given the wealth of available documents online on his previous activities, I stand on my right to question him. After all I use very little space if you truly would tally up.

I appreciate your wise commentary,

nononsense

just sharing what I have come more to realize as I've gotten "older"... and maybe a little wiser.

I do think it is OK to challenge another on ET with respect to trading issues and the like... but why make it personal. Just state your case, support it and be confident!

Bonne chance... good trading!

ICe

 

[nononsense]

Quote from Scientist:

I don't lie.
I've actually got some good relations to the moderators, and I get them to delete your posts all the time - You didn't notice? ~THE Scientist

Quote from nononsense:


Pointless to have any further dealings with you unless you restore ALL postings that you made disappear as you told us in the above quote - not only mine but also yours. If it arranges you, you do indeed restore posts. I have never encountered such a shameless character! Don't tell us you keep up relations with the Queen of Denmark! Preposterous!

Obviously you could not pull these of the board by yourself. No futher spin needed, your above statement is most remarkable. I certainly have no explanation for this.

dbphoenix has nothing whatsoever to do with this, I quote him only to CONFIRM the disappearance of a number of pages. The rest of your habitual spin, here on dbphoenix, is irrelevant.

Scientist, I specifically refer with ALL - of course - to all YOUR postings within the pages that are now gone. In fact you just DID bring ONE posting by YOU back in this thread. Why not the other RELEVANT few posts by YOU that now are most conveniently missing? I should have better said that you keep these others posts out of sight. Funny you can bring one back, not the other. In view of the way you bragg here below, I can't trust that you would not have these anymore. That's all.

Quote from Scientist:

I don't lie.
I've actually got some good relations to the moderators, and I get them to delete your posts all the time - You didn't notice? ~THE Scientist

Shame on you again.

nononsense