Hershey's Equity thread
- Thread starter oddiduro
- Start date
- Status
Where's Magna? We need him to clean up this thread.
We will all see Jack do it himself from then on. No more need to swallow his gobbledegook for which I'm mentally not equipped.
I can continue to be lazy and simply ring it up on my cash register. Go Jack Go!
I can continue to be lazy and simply ring it up on my cash register. Go Jack Go!
OK, I'll play. I did a screen for stocks over $10 and >100% volume increase. Sorted by volume, left with 6 stocks over 200k volume. They are in order by descending volume: SGP, SIE, PPH, HOC, KFS, and EIP.
EDIT: I was reading the volume wrong. Had to adjust volume change to 50% to get more results. Here is the correct list: SGP, PFE, SIE, PPH, FNFG.
EDIT again: OK I'm an idiot. Somehow I had acc/dist of -5 selected. There are a ton of stocks with volume change of 250%, over $10 a share, and enough volume.
EDIT: I was reading the volume wrong. Had to adjust volume change to 50% to get more results. Here is the correct list: SGP, PFE, SIE, PPH, FNFG.
EDIT again: OK I'm an idiot. Somehow I had acc/dist of -5 selected. There are a ton of stocks with volume change of 250%, over $10 a share, and enough volume.
This thread is not being moderated because the moderator is on vacation. I know this and I am dealing with the situation accordingly. This thread is a mess and it will stay that way. So I am wedging info in between the the stuff that can't be removed because the moderator is not here.
There is no chance for fairness in the trading forum. That forum is one where we see a moderating focus on trivialities like words that are dirty to some poeple. The inability to be fair kind of difficulty for members is a tough one but it is not going to change in the trading forum. It has been clearly explained why that moderator gets hardons about stuff there and I now have a frame of reference. I needed a thread cleaned and made fair and it is not going to happen. I say "who cares"; the thread in it's fucked up state is going to stay there as an abuse to me.
Rightnow we are moving to our first data input from people who cull our first three short lists. what comes up is that peoploe get on the same page using the same standard.
This is big time progress that only got slowed down for a few days. I am trying to keep my lines going all the way across the page. My short lines series as seen as poetry. They are it turns out in character statement sort of way.
There is no chance for fairness in the trading forum. That forum is one where we see a moderating focus on trivialities like words that are dirty to some poeple. The inability to be fair kind of difficulty for members is a tough one but it is not going to change in the trading forum. It has been clearly explained why that moderator gets hardons about stuff there and I now have a frame of reference. I needed a thread cleaned and made fair and it is not going to happen. I say "who cares"; the thread in it's fucked up state is going to stay there as an abuse to me.
Rightnow we are moving to our first data input from people who cull our first three short lists. what comes up is that peoploe get on the same page using the same standard.
This is big time progress that only got slowed down for a few days. I am trying to keep my lines going all the way across the page. My short lines series as seen as poetry. They are it turns out in character statement sort of way.
Jack, I've tried scanning but I get 100's of results. My criteria, >$10 a share, 250% volume increase, and avg volume >200k. What do I do to shorten the list?
- Status