Herman Cain is Doomed politically

[pspr]

Quote from RCG Trader:

You are missing it Navin, which does not surprise me.

The moment of Slander was AT THE PODIUM, when she publicly said Cain pretty much sexually assaulted her. If he DID NOT DO IT, that is slander. What proof?

The press conference would be more than enuf.

You really have a poor understanding of what would constitute proof. I'm am amazed at your lack of analytical ability.

Cut your losses and go back to watching your BSNBC.

 

[RCG Trader]

Quote from pspr:

You really have a poor understanding of what would constitute proof. I'm am amazed at your lack of analytical ability.

Cut your losses and go back to watching your BSNBC.

You know what pspr?

I am willing to hear your side.

Please elaborate, if you can.

 

[pspr]

Quote from Lucrum:

So...where we meeting for lunch today gents? The Peoria hospital cafeteria?

No thanks. There is obviously something in the food/water there that tends to lower brain function.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from RCG Trader:

Yip yap, says the lap dog pspr

So true.

 

[Trader666]

I did, dumbass. He'd still have to prove the accusations are false. What part of that don't you understand?

Quote from RCG Trader:

And you need to be able to read to the end. Ritalin helps with this so I am told.

 

[pspr]

Quote from RCG Trader:

You know what pspr?

I am willing to hear your side.

Please elaborate, if you can.

My side of which? Cain should sue Bialak (SP) based on her press conference?
Unless he can some how prove that she never met with him 14 years ago there is no way to prove slander. Or, barring that, unless Cain has a witness in this case that was there at the point were the alleged harrassment took place. The burden of proof is on him, not her. He cannot prove her words are not the truth. Of course, she could admit she is lying. Otherwise, it would be impossible for Cain to prevail in such a suit.

 

[maxpi]

Quote from RCG Trader:

You are missing it Navin, which does not surprise me.

The moment of Slander was AT THE PODIUM, when she publicly said Cain pretty much sexually assaulted her. If he DID NOT DO IT, that is slander. What proof?

The press conference would be more than enuf.

you're like, seriously handicapped...

 

[RCG Trader]

Quote from pspr:

My side of which? Cain should sue Bialak (SP) based on her press conference?
Unless he can some how prove that she never met with him 14 years ago there is no way to prove slander. Or, barring that, unless Cain has a witness in this case that was there at the point were the alleged harrassment took place. The burden of proof is on him, not her. He cannot prove her words are not the truth. Of course, she could admit she is lying. Otherwise, it would be impossible for Cain to prevail in such a suit.

Fair enuf.

I would file even if it cost me money, simply because she is a lying bitch. I would say, in my no nonsense, Malcolm X, way of saying that we will not be non-violent with anyone who is violent with us, that this will not be tolerated. I would drag her in front of a judge on GP.

That will make others think twice.

It is like living in the hood. If someone bigger than you hits you, you try to knock their block off. Same principle.

 

[RCG Trader]

Quote from maxpi:

you're like, seriously handicapped...

Seriously handicapped how? Do you have an argument, or are you another chimp who found a keyboard?

 

[RCG Trader]

Quote from Trader666:

I did, dumbass. He'd still have to prove the accusations are false. What part of that don't you understand?

You did NOT read to the end. I will give you another chance before I embarrass you.