Quote from traderNik:
WHAT????
Canada's sensationalist media? Are you joking? This is coming from an American? I will guess that you've never watched a Canadian news broadcast. During the Vermont tragedy, the CBC refused to broadcast repeated images of the killer and the phone video and stills of the events. There was a big debate about it on national radio here this past Sunday. Most agreed that we don't want or certainly need to see these things repeatedly. Compare and contrast that to your news services.
Sorry Haroki, but that's just absurd. Countries with gun control have way less gun violence per capita than the U.S. The problem isn't a sensationalist media which is brainwashing us poor Canadian sheeple. There are plenty of links to the U.S. DOJ numbers in this thread - I suggest you click on a few of them.
Your fellow 2nd Amendment advocates here are positing a bunch of other theories to explain the levels of gun violence in the U.S. But none of them has ever tried to claim that there is no problem and that it is non-US media that are lying about these levels.
I have asked repeatedly for some indication of how many times a civilian uses a gun to protect him or herself from violence, since this is one of the foundations of the gun lobby's claims re: free access to guns - we need to be able to defend ourselves. My guess is that out of the 10,000+ gun deaths in the U.S in 2004, some infinitesimally small number were attributable to this type of self-defense.
Unfortunately, I will again have to include a disclaimer - I am not necessarily for the complete abolishment of private gun ownership, or even private handgun ownership. This kid walked into a gun shop and purchased a gun then did it again a month later. He was a red-flag case if there ever was one. There needs to be a way to make sure that after the diagnoses he had, he is not EVER able to walk into a gun shop and buy a gun. That is it. Period. That's the kind of gun control I am talking about - common sense gun control that even 2nd Amendment guys (the rational ones) would agree on.