.
Quote from Algorithm:
Ripley,
Have you ever thought that you may be correct? The common statistic touted around these boards is a 95% failure rate. If you take that statistic into account, then maybe only 5% can make money constantly in the markets. So, maybe you are correct and you fall into that 95% category.
Now what is interesting is the fact that you are going to argue that either the 95% statistic is incorrect, or you are or should be in the 5% after you have basically publicly capitulated.
Maybe 95% of this game is psychology and mental and only 5% are capable of mastering these aspects of the game. I don't know, maybe the 5% that make it would have eventually lost it if they wouldn't have stopped trading or their "time is coming".
So, in the end, I'll give you you're arguments main premise; markets are too efficient, more efficient than one's ability to consistently make quick, correct choices and follow through with efficient execution. Now, after having conceded to you the main premise of your argument, I have to ask why do you consistently attempt the impossible?
Maybe it's just time to move on and stop trying to find angles for mastering a game that cannot be mastered for it is impossible due to the fact of your "efficient market's" theory.
Quote from Algorithm:
Ripley,
Have you ever thought that you may be correct? The common statistic touted around these boards is a 95% failure rate. If you take that statistic into account, then maybe only 5% can make money constantly in the markets. So, maybe you are correct and you fall into that 95% category.
Now what is interesting is the fact that you are going to argue that either the 95% statistic is incorrect, or you are or should be in the 5% after you have basically publicly capitulated.
Maybe 95% of this game is psychology and mental and only 5% are capable of mastering these aspects of the game. I don't know, maybe the 5% that make it would have eventually lost it if they wouldn't have stopped trading or their "time is coming".
So, in the end, I'll give you you're arguments main premise; markets are too efficient, more efficient than one's ability to consistently make quick, correct choices and follow through with efficient execution. Now, after having conceded to you the main premise of your argument, I have to ask why do you consistently attempt the impossible?
Maybe it's just time to move on and stop trying to find angles for mastering a game that cannot be mastered for it is impossible due to the fact of your "efficient market's" theory.
Quote from Algorithm:
So, in the end, I'll give you you're arguments main premise; markets are too efficient, more efficient than one's ability to consistently make quick, correct choices and follow through with efficient execution. Now, after having conceded to you the main premise of your argument, I have to ask why do you consistently attempt the impossible?
Maybe it's just time to move on and stop trying to find angles for mastering a game that cannot be mastered for it is impossible due to the fact of your "efficient market's" theory.
Quote from Ripley:
I really cannot see anyone else making it considering I am bright, intelligent, smart, extremely hardworking etc etc
Quote from Dustin:
This is a pretty funny comment. If you share with us what you have tried over the past few years, and maybe someone here can steer you in the right direction.
Quote from Ripley:
I believe for pretty much everyone, to learn to trade without a mentor would be IMPOSSIBLE (considering no sane profitable mentor would waste their time, the only way to do it is by yourself).