not here to punish anybody, though I must say that seeing some of your posts, well I'd say that perhaps you're in the wrong forum trying to hone on those poetry skills.
back to the topic at hand, anytime I see "beat the market", that's good for a bloomberg articles or hedge fund bull$hit for the masses.
there is a lot of money that can be extracted from the markets, but as trader to trader (me the aspiring one, you the "pro") please explain it to me, what point or value is there in comparing trading results on one time frame to some benchmark based on the other (longer that is) time frame?
or to put it simply, what part of "the market can not be beaten" you don't understand?
The market can't be beaten ...
I see nothing than a generality ...
When trading is about peculiarity ...
I don't understand the value it has ...
Comparing a strategy from it's underlying ?
It's based on the same time frame, daily.
I've a derivative that beats its parent.
Buy & Hold otherwise, or trash it.
No need to suffer for worse ...
Get it ? Well it's flawed.
Since past performance,
Isn't indicative of future ones.
And I am not a "Pro". See my threads.
Not profitable. However we're all learning,
Due to whatever change in the basic conditions.
Buzzwords attract people. Which in turn attract criticism.
That's the good point about them. It brings feedbacks.
But yeah ... One doesn't have to beat anything.
Just to build a derivative that satisfies one's preferences.
But what if the derivative is less pleasant than the underlying ?
That's why I compare. To see if there is value in the effort.
I wouldn't buy and hold. Because it does not satisfy me.
So I try to turn the underlying into something better.
Analyze the derivative, the underlying & compare.