Thats right, it can just go sideways
I had to learn the hard way by losing a ton of money over several years back in the 80/90s, so now I over test methods over min of ten years for day trading, forward and only then go live. Futures so not trade like counterparts of stocks, too many stocks and just so many future instruments, so one has to expect much more controlled environment trading futures for brief times, otherwise there be no arbing or HFTs. It is just like people who do Fibs, that works cause so many people do it, there is no magic to 61.8%, same with chart patterns, those who can apply sound money management trade for decades and those who "play" the market fade away.
And I agree with you, must have clear and precise trading rules and if it can't be coded means rules are not precise enough. I laugh when someone does 100 sample size and wonder why Monday morning they losing.
Sounds like a good approach but never take any trading idea for granted, no matter how clever it looks, backtest it first with any enough data, assuming the trading rules are clearly defined.
I had to learn the hard way by losing a ton of money over several years back in the 80/90s, so now I over test methods over min of ten years for day trading, forward and only then go live. Futures so not trade like counterparts of stocks, too many stocks and just so many future instruments, so one has to expect much more controlled environment trading futures for brief times, otherwise there be no arbing or HFTs. It is just like people who do Fibs, that works cause so many people do it, there is no magic to 61.8%, same with chart patterns, those who can apply sound money management trade for decades and those who "play" the market fade away.
And I agree with you, must have clear and precise trading rules and if it can't be coded means rules are not precise enough. I laugh when someone does 100 sample size and wonder why Monday morning they losing.
