If you cannot take the risks of market going up and down, you should not invest. And as Jones75 said, for a long term investor, to buy put to protect your gain is counter productive, you will end up with no gain since you will have to buy them continuously to cover all occasions. If you don't buy continuously, you are liable to guess wrong.Hi all,
Would this kind of method work?:
Portfolio with
100 000 $ long in stocks
100 000 $ short in options (equivalent of 100 000$) if the market crashes (as an insurance)
Will this work or is it not worth the effort because of the large cost of insurance you pay in case something bad happens?
Are there less costly ways to hedge your portfolio?
TIA
As an example, let's look at AAPL, a 1 year ATM put costs about $11.5 per share, that is 10% of the current stock price. AAPL stocks + dividends have to go up 10% a year for you to just breakeven. Shorter term puts are even more expensive and even more so at time of market turmoil like 2008 when you really need it.
Did I just argue that short AAPL puts are good investments?
I beg to disagree. As an investor we should accept some fluctuations of the market but for a house, you cannot afford to have it burned down especially if you have a mortgage.That's silly -- it's like saying "When your house doesn't burn down, are you going to be happy about the cost you paid for insurance?"