Quote from hedgeyourbets:
"formal education" sometimes helps to end up working on Wall St. for major IBs... If you do your research, you will see that most (not all) major successful funds are run by people with such background. That's how they tend to establish their name and client base so they can go and raise money on thier own later...
I am not saying you are wrong about that.
but, ultimately, it is those who can trade better who get the money to trade.
If someone has a Harvard Business School with high distinction - a Baker Scholar (top 5% of class) for instance, and has a Harvard Law School degree as part of the JD/MBA program, and magna cum laude from Princeton majoring in Economics.
With a history focused on investment management, finance, and securities law. Having received the John Loeb Award (awarded to the top four students in finance) and Sheridan Logan Fellowship (awarded to one Baker Scholar) at Harvard Business School, and makes 40% a year...
compared to someone else, who is a high-school drop out, but can trade currencies proficiently and competently, and produce 75% a year, the smartest will money go to the later.
In my particular case, I'd define myself as a "risk-adverse" money manager.
So, my objective if I ran public money would be to return 10 to 12 percent yearly (after fees) to investors, with lower risk trading methods.
If more money goes to guys who can make higher returns, fine.
I'll happily be a participant in tapping the $100t dollar asset base along with the top traders in the world.
I look at the prospects in view of the long haul.