Quote from EPrado:
To be really honest, you come across as a grade one jackass. Now if thats what the TV producers wanted and it was you acting thats one thing. Hopefully thats the story and you really aren't like that clown on tv. The scene with you and the rest of the little league team at the dinner table was priceless. Talk about arrogance.
My "adapt to mkt conditions" statement was based on your early success, and what now seems to be pretty big failure. Correct me if I am wrong.
I'm going to create some tickers of my own so I don't have to keep repeating myself:
TVEP (the purpose of TV is to Entertain People)
RBJM (Read my Book before Judging Me)
ICDP (due to industry regulations, I Can't Discuss my Performance)
My TV show was very TVEP. Period. RBJM because until then you're just speculating. RBJM regarding my performance because ICDP
Quote from sportmatt37:
Yo Tim I got a question for you that has nothing to do with trading. I saw an episode yesterday which showed you on the golf course. Was that Ashbrook Golf Course in Scotch Plains, NJ? I recognized the disgusting lake. If so, I play there often - how did you end up at that course?
Great call--yes, they were the only course that would allow filming. Pretty sweet course actually, especially for the money.
Quote from trendmomentum:
I just checked "TS on CNBC" on you tube .... "beautiful chart" .... what a clown.
Another door mat in the making! Poor rain forest, what a waste.
TVEP
Quote from SiSePuede!:
1. It's fairly pitiful that you have to use a 5 year old statistic to show off your "great past success!"
2. What funds have you worked at? What trading floors have you worked on? Do you honestly think you run a hedge fund? How much money did you ever raise? Wasn't most of the money in your fund your own? You're like a little kid who sells lemonade and tells people he runs a restaurant.
3. "I talk about Wiley's offer to show that my book is freaken amazing!" You're writing a pop book...not a financial book. There is a difference. "When Genius Failed" and "Liar's Poker" probably outsold most trading books...people like Pop. It's interesting and I don't doubt that your book might be good entertainment.
4. Who cares what you think about the publishing industry? Those supposed inefficiencies you've exploited in your trading career have left you using tired 5 year old statistics. What, do you expect to make a whopping $50k on your book?
5. CNBC is supposed to be a financial tv channel. Who cares what the talking heads do? Is that any reason to act like a putz? I guess you think so.
I know of some of your great
p) trades and they're not great. It's too bad you can't disclose an audited list of ALL of your trades and balances because I think you'd immediately be sent packing with the "den of wolves" howling with laughter.
1. ICDP
2. I never claimed to be bigtime, that's why my book is called "An American Hedge Fund, not "The american Hedge Fund". I'm just one example.
3. Mine is a story that's meant to entertain AND educate. I think that's much more helpful than books that only do one or the other.
4. I expect to make many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars.
5. TVEP
Quote from Rodney King:
I read the book (thanks again for the comp!) on the plane back from Chicago last night , and here's my back-of-the envelope: I liked the book better than I'd expected. It's a fast and breezy read, and had a pleasantly candid and enthusiastic tone. Mr Sikes comes across as an eager, hard-working, observant market participant with good hondling sensibilities. Several of his trading ideas, though typically not original/unique to him, are well presented and explained. ItThe one negative is the long digression about a private-equity situation that didn't pan out. It distracts from the main narrative flow. But I guess those are the facts of the case. Anyway, I give it a thumbs up. For a market veteran, it's best read with an empty mind, without preconceptions such as 'what the heck does a 20 year old know?', and can be enjoyed as such.
That's a great review, please message me or email me--I'd love to print some of that blurb if you're okay with it.
Quote from atticus:
MAR/II and Barclay post performance figs on thousands of funds. What specific regs are you referring to?
ICDP--look up SEC rules regarding hedge fund advertising
Quote from SiSePuede!:
Tim apparently hasn't done anything in the last 5 years, or his rhetorical jibe about his gains would be updated don't you think?
Seriously, who is congratulatory of people who made a ton of money in the tech bubble? Tim is pretty much using a statistic half a decade old to promote now...it really doesn't say much for his recent performance.
Tim likes to say that he can't scale which is ridiculous. In the micro/small caps, you can scale to $10M easily, maybe not all in one position, without hurting yourself IF YOU'RE GOOD AT WHAT YOU DO. If you're not good you'll say something like you can't scale which is bullshit.
1. ICDP--and I hardly consider my solid gains of 2001 and 2002 to be a part of the tech bubble. I started my fund in 2003 so I can't discuss it publicly --get that through your tiny brain.
2. When I say scale, I mean $100mm+ or $1B. I think the microcap market is great for people with realistic expectations.
Quote from Rodney King:
Which reminds me: In the book, you describe visiting SAC but don't name the firm. Gives the manuscript a bit of an (over)lawyered tone.
Actually haven't heard what my lawyer is going to think. As you notice, I don't mention any people's names--only stocks because my trades are the main characters--everybody else is just an extra.
Quote from mde2004:
Will be buying the book and becoming a pro like you. Can't wait to make my second million dollars.
Great, I wish you much luck.
Quote from SiSePuede!:
That has noting to do with his abilities as a trader. And you don't know the full terms of the deal do you? Could have been $35k advance and .5% of sales.
It was $35k and a scaling percent of sales, anywhere from 12.5% to 17.5% with bonuses if I hit any bestseller lists.