Quote from Drew07:
Did you join ET for the sole purpose of promoting your new book? If so that's cool I'm just curious. I think you have a pretty tough crowd to pitch to around here with everyone throwing punches at you. Best of luck regardless.
Nah, I stumbled upon the Hedge Fund TV Show thread and I felt compelled to join in all the fun. Of course, my upcoming book may have had something to do with it
I could care less about people throwing punches at me--bring all the bastards on, I got nothin' to hide!
Quote from kinggyppo:
I will try again here. How do you deal with the added volatility of the smaller cap stocks you trade and exploit that fact. I am trying to understand your trading methodology, thanks.
I've tried trading other market segments, but they're all just too boring/ efficient. As I've previously stated, I'm horrible at timing so I need all the volatility I can get in order to give myself the best chance of hopping on and off during these stocks' wild rides.
And to To Answer SisePuede's hour long post:
1. I talk about my great past success for credibility-sake, not to brag. If industry regulations permitted, I'd talk about my recent performance, too.
2. I will not hide the truth in some BS book like many people in finance have done. I don't write to try to grow my business, I write to teach. I'm not presenting some get rick quick scheme, its an accurate rendering of ALL my trading and hedge fund experiences. Thousands of people have taken the time to contact me--many of these have never stepped foot inside the trading world-- I will not feed them to the wolves. My book is gonna help teach, inspire, entertain a whole lotta people about trading and that's that.
3. I talk about Wiley's offer to show that my book is freaken amazing! Most first time authors only get a $15k advance offer, mine was nearly 2.5x that. And they only read the first 80 pages. If you knew anything about publishing, you would understand that $35k is a lot for a first time financial author. Once again, not bragging, CREDIBILITY. I would've thought that somebody who's posted over 1,000 times on this site might understand a little something about business, but apparently not.
4. I talk about how I rejected Wiley because I think the publishing industry is even more inefficient than microcaps--as always, I plan on exploiting these market inefficiencies.
5. As for bringing models on CNBC-why you don't you try and open your mind a little. If you think that was a schmucky thing to do then fine. Then you won't mind if I think you're a schmuck for criticizing somebody who tried something new to mix it up a little. Aren't you a little tired of all the talking heads trying to talk over each other and show how smart they are? I am--call me crazy, but I prefer to watch models holding stocks charts and seeing how angry Melissa Francis can get. C'mon and live a little, its fun--trust me!