Quote from stu:
...about the information and understanding you have in regard to a cure, I am certain you are serious.
Iâm sure there are many new and previously impossible applications through the development of what are basically natural substances. These things and more will no doubt be forthcoming , thanks to the possibilities in scientific progress.
But that's the point.
Anyone who is being serious would realize cancer will only , and can only, be cured then eradicated by science. Not preposterous prayer ritual.
The religious apparently in a thread like this one for example, are content to wallow in displays of self-absorbed sanctimonious indulgence rather than to first call or push for a cure.
In my view religion will in that way render a society generally incompetent if it's not kept in check.
Resting on futility , the gushingly effusive emotional outburst "Heaven has a new Angel" has their imaginary friend making everything alright because a child died.
Or in some cases trying to turn culture at large against finding solutions because some part crosses with their ridiculous infantile beliefs.
Thank goodness there are scientists who will not be relying on nauseous chain letters covered in cutesy prayer to see if there is a basis for treatment that can be found in the way you mention.
Well said.
It just boggles my mind, that supposedly rational people will disregard something, without checking, without testing-as stated, im dead serious about this, after all the other stuff i came up with was accurate *enough* against odds of hundreds of billions to one, and could, potentially, have save thousands (+) of people from horrible traumatic deaths.
Why not this?
Grief is a powerful emotion, but people will never find what they are looking for if they are looking in the wrong place.
If anyone just happens to be a billionaire, or just happens to run a cancer research facility, the plant in question is a species of thornapple, a datura variety (much to my surprise, on looking it up) in fact.