Heat goes on: Earth headed for warmest year on record
- Thread starter futurecurrents
- Start date
Link us to the peer reviewed paper showing that evolution is true. Answer - "you won't because there is no science." "The one's citing models have no failed?" What does that mean? Time to change meds again jem.
Why if some scientist could prove that evolution is true he would win the Nobel Prize !
1. first of all you have gone full psycho on us FC...
secondly you don't seem to understand science at all any more.
2. Scientists working on part of the pathway from non life to life could win the nobel prize... in fact I think they have.
I think Cech won a Nobel prize for RNA reserach.
http://www.panspermia.org/rnaworld.htm
And I am pretty sure I have quote other prize winners here in the past.
secondly you don't seem to understand science at all any more.
2. Scientists working on part of the pathway from non life to life could win the nobel prize... in fact I think they have.
I think Cech won a Nobel prize for RNA reserach.
http://www.panspermia.org/rnaworld.htm
And I am pretty sure I have quote other prize winners here in the past.
I knew a guy that was a self taught comic book illustrator. He argued atomic physics in the letters to the editors section of a science fiction magazine for many months. FC is cut from similar cloth I'm sure...
Nah. Quantum physics is beyond me. How can the state of one particle effect that of another separated by by millions of miles ? They're just making that shit up.
And the comic book illustrator....did he also have a doctorate in atomic physics and a very high IQ. I mean, how could a comic book illustrator have those things? It's impossible right?
Last edited:
I believe one of the theories that is a best fit for things such as quantum entanglement is that we could really be a hologram. or as Plato may have thought - shadows of the perfect form.
see Susskind below.
(I really like his idea because I think it explains how the Creator could be the Light of the world and have a dual or triune nature... but lets be clear my speculation is in addition to Susskind... I am not in any way he is saying the light is the Creator)
Susskind on holgrams...
see Susskind below.
(I really like his idea because I think it explains how the Creator could be the Light of the world and have a dual or triune nature... but lets be clear my speculation is in addition to Susskind... I am not in any way he is saying the light is the Creator)
Susskind on holgrams...
The world is not a hologram. Susskind is an idiot. 
Quantum entanglement works for a very simple reason. All that there is now was once one, thus all the pieces are still part of the same net. To pull on a string here distorts the net over there. They are not two particles but two "halves" of a whole.
Quantum entanglement works for a very simple reason. All that there is now was once one, thus all the pieces are still part of the same net. To pull on a string here distorts the net over there. They are not two particles but two "halves" of a whole.so one minute you say this... "Quantum physics is beyond me. How can the state of one particle effect that of another separated by by millions of miles ? They're just making that shit up."
and then a few hours later after you meds wear off your manic side kicks in and you say this...
"The world is not a hologram. Susskind is an idiot. Quantum entanglement works for a very simple reason. All that there is now was once one, thus all the pieces are still part of the same net. To pull on a string here distorts the net over there. They are not two particles but two "halves" of a whole."
I am sure Susskind is going to get working on the Yin Yang defeats light years idea... asap. Wow... how come he did not think of that.
and then a few hours later after you meds wear off your manic side kicks in and you say this...
"The world is not a hologram. Susskind is an idiot.
Quantum entanglement works for a very simple reason. All that there is now was once one, thus all the pieces are still part of the same net. To pull on a string here distorts the net over there. They are not two particles but two "halves" of a whole."I am sure Susskind is going to get working on the Yin Yang defeats light years idea... asap. Wow... how come he did not think of that.