Heat goes on: Earth headed for warmest year on record

[futurecurrents]

Let's provide a hint on why many recent temperature readings are inappropriately high compared to previous readings. It is because many instruments are placed at airports which are producing instrumentation errors on the high side...

Here is one of many similar articles...

RDU airport up to it's old tricks again
A trend has emerged the last few years for Raleigh to be a heat island in the state of North Carolina. Many days in the past few years have seen Raleigh soar to a high temperature that seems inappropriately high when compared to other observation stations around the area. This occurred again yesterday. RDU's recorded high for the day was 97 which tied a record, but as you can see no one else in the state and even the southeast was as warm.

http://www.examiner.com/article/rdu-airport-up-to-it-s-old-tricks-again

Yes, and the ice is melting because of all those airport thermometers. Could you be any stupider?

 

[Fractals 'R Us]

this whole thing is getting really old. The only question, the only debate should be, "How much does man made co2 contribute to global warming?"

I've known this for years... it's tough being an engineer. For one thing our thinking has to lead to stuff that actually works. Politicians and Warmists don't have that restriction. Mankind contributes a tiny increase to all the gases per year and that is all I need to know about the issue.

Now I have to go over to the personal side: if I ever hit a jaywalking pedestrian I hope it's one of these alarmists. My dad hated alarmist type people. His friends were mobsters too... so I had this job when I was a kid and there was a guy that screamed and yelled at me at shift change and he was in charge of nobody and not even on my shift. I mentioned it to dear ole' dad, not really asking anybody to do anything, it was just unusual behaviour and I was making conversation about my job... a couple days go by then two guys came in off the street at shift change and beat the guy to a pulp, stuffed him in a stall in the bathroom unconscious. I learned from that that alarmist types are to be disposed of any way possible and I think Dad had it right... I just tell them to stay the fuck away from me with their shit and usually they do that. I think they can sense that I don't feel the need to tolerate them. I guess if I had to beat one to a pulp and stuff him away somewhere to keep my sanity on an even keel I would happily do that.

I never really understood how much dear ole' Dad cared about me until he sent those guys just so I could have some peace of mind! He was a saint, and if he wasn't, well, he should have been!

 

[stoic]

They weren't climate scientists. They were meteorologists, professional and amateur. And yes generally their instruments were very accurate even back in the 1880's. They calibrated them via the temp of melting ice and of boiling water. This establishes the readings. A mercury thermometer is a very simple and accurate device.

Meteorologists, professional and amateur is acceptable. Stationed around the globe is doubtful. The freezing point of water can vary slightly or a lot based on impurities. The boiling point for water can vary greatly based on barometric pressure which can change from one day to the next. The statement showing such exactitude to 1/100 of a degree is brought into question.

 

[gwb-trading]

Yes, and the ice is melting because of all those airport thermometers. Could you be any stupider?

 

[futurecurrents]

Meteorologists, professional and amateur is acceptable. Stationed around the globe is doubtful. The freezing point of water can vary slightly or a lot based on impurities. The boiling point for water can vary greatly based on barometric pressure which can change from one day to the next. The statement showing such exactitude to 1/100 of a degree is brought into question.

They use distilled water and for the boiling point elevation is compensated for. And yes there are/were thermometers in both hemispheres.

 

[futurecurrents]

I've known this for years... it's tough being an engineer. For one thing our thinking has to lead to stuff that actually works. Politicians and Warmists don't have that restriction. Mankind contributes a tiny increase to all the gases per year and that is all I need to know about the issue.

Now I have to go over to the personal side: if I ever hit a jaywalking pedestrian I hope it's one of these alarmists. My dad hated alarmist type people. His friends were mobsters too... so I had this job when I was a kid and there was a guy that screamed and yelled at me at shift change and he was in charge of nobody and not even on my shift. I mentioned it to dear ole' dad, not really asking anybody to do anything, it was just unusual behaviour and I was making conversation about my job... a couple days go by then two guys came in off the street at shift change and beat the guy to a pulp, stuffed him in a stall in the bathroom unconscious. I learned from that that alarmist types are to be disposed of any way possible and I think Dad had it right... I just tell them to stay the fuck away from me with their shit and usually they do that. I think they can sense that I don't feel the need to tolerate them. I guess if I had to beat one to a pulp and stuff him away somewhere to keep my sanity on an even keel I would happily do that.

I never really understood how much dear ole' Dad cared about me until he sent those guys just so I could have some peace of mind! He was a saint, and if he wasn't, well, he should have been!

No the 40% extra CO2 is from man. They know this beyond a doubt. 40% is not a small amount.

As far as your crazed hatred for scientists that warn of an upcoming problem.....get professional help. I am not surprised that your dad was a mobster.

 

[jem]

You again take info out of context.
you are at the lowest form of troll.
(regarding my experience you have very little knowledge of the work I have done in my over 20 years of having a law license. so really have no idea if a I worked for a prosecutors office or not)

but we know this jury instruction applies to you...
falsus in uno falsus in omnibus

Oh right, you said the evidence was not sufficient. You are insane. And now we know why you are a second-rate real estate lawyer. The lowest form of lawyer that there is. Criminal law is certainly too much for you.

 

[Max E.]

but we know this jury instruction applies to you...
falsus in uno falsus in omnibus

 

[futurecurrents]

You again take info out of context.
you are at the lowest form of troll.
(regarding my experience you have very little knowledge of the work I have done in my over 20 years of having a law license. so really have no idea if a I worked for a prosecutors office or not)

but we know this jury instruction applies to you...
falsus in uno falsus in omnibus

You basically said that if you were on the jury you would have found him not guilty. That's insane and par for the course with you. Also insane is the idea that he was framed by the police. Of course no one here is surprised that you are insane. In addition to being a liar. Comes easily to lawyers.

 

[jem]

Last page you said I said he was innocent.

This is my quote...


"As the jurors did I would have found for the plaintiffs for big money in a civil court.
I was pretty sure he did it, but given the evidence at trial I might not have found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. I did not see all the evidence but I was concerned that it looked like the cops might have tried to frame a guilty guy.

I also note, I take the constitution very seriously and I also believe prosecutors frequently misrepresent what a reasonable doubt is. "