Heat goes on: Earth headed for warmest year on record

[futurecurrents]

In fact less than 1% of publishing climate scientists deny AGW.


I have brought my previous study … up-to-date by reviewing peer-reviewed articles in scientific journals over the period from Nov. 12, 2012 through December 31, 2013. I found 2,258 articles, written by a total of 9,136 authors. … Only one article, by a single author in the Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, rejected man-made global warming.

James Powell .org

And as Powell points out, the Russian who proclaims we are not the cause of global warming and rapid climate change is obviously agenda driven, as the Russian scientist himself admits, cutting fossil fuel use would hurt Russia’s economy.

As Powell sums it up:

The scientific literature since 1991 contains a mountain of evidence confirming man-made global warming as true and no convincing evidence that it is false. Global warming denial is a house of cards.

 

[futurecurrents]

Deniers just look like fools at this point.

 

[fhl]

• ‘Historic!’ USA Severe Weather Count Hits Record Low Levels

NOAA: ‘Unprecedented’ lack of tornadoes and storms – ‘We are in uncharted territory with respect to lack of severe weather’

 

[futurecurrents]

• ‘Historic!’ USA Severe Weather Count Hits Record Low Levels

NOAA: ‘Unprecedented’ lack of tornadoes and storms – ‘We are in uncharted territory with respect to lack of severe weather’

Irrelevant

 

[Max E.]

Irrelevant

Why is it irrelevant? Is it irrelevant because Global warming fanatics were proven dead wrong?

 

[futurecurrents]

Why is it irrelevant? Is it irrelevant because Global warming fanatics were proven dead wrong?

Wow you are dumb. You still don't know difference between weather and climate.

More tornadoes and storms was never predicted by the science community as whole. Intensity of storms WAS predicted to go up and there is evidence that it is happening.

Extreme events
The number of record high temperature events in the United States has been increasing, while the number of record low temperature events has been decreasing, since 1950. The U.S. has also witnessed increasing numbers of intense rainfall events.11

http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/


I welcome your peer reviewed paper proving NASA wrong.

 

[WeToddDid2]

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-16/these-tiny-bubbles-may-save-the-planet

These Tiny Bubbles May Save the Planet
In episode 4 of The Spark, carbon-absorbing nanobubbles could be the key to cutting greenhouse-gas emissions

The polymer bubbles are filled with the entirely pedestrian ingredient of baking soda, long known to absorb carbon dioxide, but it’s the bubbles themselves that are the breakthrough. They’re permeable, which means that CO2 gets trapped and absorbed by the baking soda solution inside them. In theory, you could affix the bubbles to the inside of a power plant smokestack and trap the CO2 before it is released into the atmosphere.

 

[fhl]

• Obama Harvard Law School Prof Lawrence Tribe on EPA Climate Regs: ‘BURNING THE CONSTITUTION CANNOT BE PART OF OUR NATIONAL ENERGY POLICY’
• 
  Laurence Tribe, a liberal constitutional scholar at Harvard University: “EPA possesses only the authority granted to it by Congress,” Tribe told lawmakers in a hearing Tuesday. “Its gambit here raises serious questions under the separation of powers… because EPA is attempting to exercise lawmaking power that belongs to Congress and judicial power that belongs to the federal courts.”
  

 

[futurecurrents]

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-16/these-tiny-bubbles-may-save-the-planet

I can't believe I'm saying this to you but, thanks for posting that.

 

[futurecurrents]

• Obama Harvard Law School Prof Lawrence Tribe on EPA Climate Regs: ‘BURNING THE CONSTITUTION CANNOT BE PART OF OUR NATIONAL ENERGY POLICY’
• 
  Laurence Tribe, a liberal constitutional scholar at Harvard University: “EPA possesses only the authority granted to it by Congress,” Tribe told lawmakers in a hearing Tuesday. “Its gambit here raises serious questions under the separation of powers… because EPA is attempting to exercise lawmaking power that belongs to Congress and judicial power that belongs to the federal courts.”

Can't burn the constitution. It would add CO2 into the air.