Heat goes on: Earth headed for warmest year on record

You're......as in "you are". Your English is atrocious. There are people in the southern US who have better English skills than you.

But you're an atheist?! So am I! I thought us atheists were supposed to be smart? Oh well. That ol' bell curve thing.


Smart = ability to solve problems, not care about crappy english rules, all reads the same to me.

Go back to panicking about the Planet LOL
 
Smart = ability to solve problems, not care about crappy english rules, all reads the same to me.

Go back to panicking about the Planet LOL


Well, if you are trying to sound intelligent it helps if you sound intelligent. Nothing that you have written gives any indication of that. In fact, quite the opposite. I thought that maybe English was not your native tongue, or that you were a high school student or a southern US conservative, but none of those things are true.

In addition, it is obvious that you don't know the first thing about the subject you are trying to write about or that you even comprehend simple things like that science orgs are not "hims".

So you'll excuse me if when you say "Don't panic", it actually makes me more apprehensive.
 
Well, if you are trying to sound intelligent it helps if you sound intelligent. Nothing that you have written gives any indication of that. In fact, quite the opposite. I thought that maybe English was not your native tongue, or that you were a high school student or a southern US conservative, but none of those things are true.

In addition, it is obvious that you don't know the first thing about the subject you are trying to write about or even comprehend simple things like that science orgs are not "hims".

So you'll excuse me if when you say "Don't panic", it actually makes me more apprehensive.

My science based opinion, doesn't match your PANIC based opinion got it!!

I'm a programmer, no group worse at english, we write in stuff you would never understand all day long, can't expect us to care about english.
 
My science based opinion, doesn't match your PANIC based opinion got it!!

I'm a programmer, no group worse at english, we write in stuff you would never understand all day long, can't expect us to care about english.


What science-based opinion? The one you you imagine? Everything you have said so far about GW is wrong. I suspect you are as ignorant about it as you are about how to write in English.

And who's panicking?
 
What science-based opinion? The one you you imagine? Everything you have said so far about GW is wrong. I suspect you are as ignorant about it as you are about how to write in English.

And who's panicking?

Only a true fool, claims himself to be right and everyone else wrong.

Am I right ?? On the basis I'm pretty neutral guess I'm covered both ways :)

Time will tell!
 
Only a true fool, claims himself to be right and everyone else wrong.

Am I right ?? On the basis I'm pretty neutral guess I'm covered both ways :)

Time will tell!

Everyone else? No I agree with the 97% of the world's publishing climate scientists and essentially all of it's science organizations. Basically all of science. If you are unsure it means you don't believe the scientists or have no common sense and/or little knowledge about AGW. There are also people who think cigarettes are not bad for you. Same thing. The science is equally sure.

And yes, in many things someone is totally right and someone else is totally wrong.
 
AGW doesn't exist. The science is pretty compelling.

Yes, I'm suggesting that I am a better judge of the extant science than you are.

No competent scientist or engineer speaks in terms of the absolutes you throw around. You are simply not qualified to judge the science either way.

You don't rely on a plumber to judge the hydrodynamics of a dam or hydroelectric installation and you don't rely on an AC installer to comprehend climate dynamics. Not if you want a good outcome anyway.
 
Back
Top