My $.02,Quote from T_Geithner:
isn't it unconstitutional to force a person to purchase something? is anyone going to sue this for forcing a health insurance purchase upon them?
From Article I section 9- Limits on Congress:
"No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."
Attainder
attainder n. The loss of all civil rights by a person sentenced for a serious crime. [< OFr. attaindre, to convict] Source: AHD
In the context of the Constitution, a Bill of Attainder is meant to mean a bill that has a negative effect on a single person or group (for example, a fine or term of imprisonment). Originally, a Bill of Attainder sentenced an individual to death, though this detail is no longer required to have an enactment be ruled a Bill of Attainder.
http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
Since the mandate is in, anyone that doesn't purchase insurance by 2016 can be fined at 2.5 % of income, and in the original bill you could serve time, I assume that is still the case. That seems to me to be a bill of attainder. Anyone who values their freedom should have an issue with this, if it this easy for the gov to force you to do something then what else is possible?
Here are other arguements, which include the commerce clause and 10th Amendment, with some examples of previous Supreme Court rulings. Also, I heard yesterday that 38 states are going to sue the fed govt over this mandate, don't know how true that is.
http://spectator.org/blog/2009/12/22/conservative-leaders-against-t
