Quote from Daal:
Sorry but you are wrong, I can give a losing moving average scalping system to anyone in the world and they wont make money in the long-run. Think outside the box, discipline actually hurts in this case since the system doesnt make money. An undisciplined guy trading a awful system has a better chance of survival.
Nothing to apologize for. Aso, I don't know anything about a moving average scalping system nor did I mention such nor did I know this thread was about such. Simply, you could be right that someone using a moving average scalping system won't make money.
Thus, I thought this thread was about the Head & Shoulders pattern and not about moving average scalping systems. Also, as a reminder, my theme is that you can't be profitable via ONE THING ONLY while ignoring everything else that's required to be profitable. Therefore, I am not saying that if you have a poor trade method that you will be profitable if you ONLY have one of those other components as if it's the holy grail. I'm saying you need a lot of things and too many traders concentrate on their trade method while ignoring everything else until it's too late...hopefully that's clearer now.
In addition, a profitable trader with all those components I mentioned will take someone's losing method...make the appropriate changes and apply it in a way that it works with his/her team ingredients. Surely you don't think a profitable trader will use it
as is without making any adjustments to fit within the puzzle.
Quote from Daal:
Regardless if other parts of the 'team' are present, in the case you are talking about a losing system. A system already tells you when you open and close positions. Position sizing does not affect your edge, discipline cant turn an unprofitable blackjack strategy into a winning one
I don't play blackjack and you could be right...no debate from me there.
As for Position Size Management, it does have an impact on trading results and it has an impact on how we manage the trades. Then again, as a reminder, it's just one piece of the puzzle and I highly recommend not to concentrate on it as if it's the holy grail via ignoring all the other important components of a trading plan.
Yeah, I've been using it effectively for many years via the help of volatility analysis and intermarket analysis.
Quote from Daal:
Why dont you try the 'H&S challenge' and trade the system explained by the New York Fed paper and try to make money, report here your results. Goodluck getting your monster discipline to overcome that garbage pattern
If I did, I wouldn't use it as is because it is poorly design. Thus, it wouldn't fit well with other components of my trading plan. Simply, I would make adjustments (changes) so that it works well with those other components in my trade methodology.
By the way, I've been using H&S patterns and others price actions profitably for over 10 years as confirmation to my primary trade method (not disclosed). I'm sure not going to use someone's else poorly designed H&S method with real money on the line that ignores everything else involved in trading profitably.
Of course, don't forget about that one big piece of the puzzle...
market experience. If you don't have the screen time...you're at a disadvantage although you can minimize that disadvantage via a good trading plan.
P.S. My trade results are reported every trading day elsewhere outside of ET for many years now...trades posted in real-time along with market commentary and statements. I'm doing just fine whenever the H&S pattern appears or any other pattern. As for your moving average scalping system...not interested because I don't use indicators.
Mark