"He Never Went In": Officer On Duty Filmed "Doing Nothing" During Florida Shooting

[Slartibartfast]

This would be an excellent question except for the fact that those on the left do not really care if criminals and crazy people get their hands on guns. Their main concern seems to be turning responsible gun owners into criminals. They relish tragedies like this school shooting because it gives them an opportunity to push their real objective, gun confiscation, and to demonize their political opponents. This time they really stooped to new lows by sending out baby seals to make their arguments for them. They have been soundly defeated in the marketplace of ideas, so they now traffic in blind emotion.

Baby seals?

The only animal that should be clubbed to death for profit around here is you AAA.

You might finally get to touch a lady's naughty bits.

 

[NeoTrader]

I have shit to do my man so I'll leave you with this for the afternoon.

I have been studying your responses to an aggressive stance. It is clear that there is a gap here in several areas. Useful for me know know. You see young killers as 'criminals' as that is the NRA line, I see them as broken tortured & depressed things with very different motivations.

I intent to help my US based assistant (who has three little kids) actually save some kids while being fair to the rights of others. Her late husband was an occasional hunter, she loves elk steaks. You are after a buzz having found an issue to stick your wick in.

You will repeat things like the chart crap because you are what I said, looking for a rise. All traders know about correlation/causation and you look a fool here.

Hugs plus "thoughts and prayers" should you ever be affected by these issues. Most cons need to have their faces rubbed in to something to have a revelation, we expect that. Dick Cheney's lesbian daughter etc.

So you basically evaded the question again and couldn't dispute my last post too. So again, you try to change the subject.

And you brought up the "chart crap". I merely stated an objective fact which is shown by your own chart: incidents have increased since 1990 and gun free zones were created in that year. There is no interpretation here. These are facts. So there is no dispute to the reality that since their creation, incidents did not decrease. Simple.

And my question still stands.

 

[NeoTrader]

You just contradicted yourself and proved yourself to be immature. All you’re doing is arguing and not thinking.

There’s a lot of you guys on this board and it’s because you don’t think about things from a principled standpoint. You’re just blowing off steam, and that’s fine, but go do that somewhere else or you’ll be blocked.

Do tell me where the contradiction is.... And while you're at it, please answer the question you insist in avoiding.

I'm not blowing any steam, I'm simply calmly making a question which you simply can't answer.

Go ahead, run away and block me, I would expect nothing less from a leftist. I couldn't care less if you block me or not.

 

[Slartibartfast]

So you basically evaded the question again and couldn't dispute my last post too. So again, you try to change the subject.

And you brought up the "chart crap". I merely stated an objective fact which is shown by your own chart: incidents have increased since 1990 and gun free zones were created in that year. There is no interpretation here. These are facts. So there is no dispute to the reality that since their creation, incidents did not decrease. Simple.

And my question still stands.

I evaded nothing worth answering

For the same reason you are a short-bus trader, you don't see how hopeless your 'clever' argument is. (Give him a year.. or seven or ten?).

Maybe Leonardo can explain it to you? He is less prone to distractions.

Younger generation eh?

 

[NeoTrader]

I evaded nothing worth answering

At least you admit you evaded it! Contrary to your buddy up there!

How convenient to you, you simply classify what you are not capable of answering (if you could you would have done so by now) as "not worth it" and simply evade it...

I always have a blast with you leftists always embarrassing yourselves when faced with logic!

 

[Slartibartfast]

At least you admit you evaded it! Contrary to your buddy up there!

How convenient to you, you simply classify what you are not capable of answering (if you could you would have done so by now) as "not worth it" and simply evade it...

I always have a blast with you leftists always embarrassing yourselves when faced with logic!

I'll put it another way.

You know I used to help out with mentally disabled men at a vocational training center? Well I did. One day in a large equipment shed by the garden center, one of the down syndrome lads was staring fixedly at the steel roof 20 feet above.

Another had thrown some dog shit up there and it stuck. He asked me why did it not come down? Now.. I could have explained about adhesion and cohesion, Van der Waals forces or acid-base interactions with the dooky and the roof... in my seconds of delay he explained it to me.

"Donal threw it so hard it would go into space! it it still going up!" and a few seconds later it fell. He was happy, I was happy he was happy?

Kind of like that with you today really.

 

[NeoTrader]

I'll put it another way.

You know I used to help out with mentally disabled men at a vocational training center? Well I did. One day in a large equipment shed by the garden center, one of the down syndrome lads was staring fixedly at the steel roof 20 feet above.

Another had thrown some dog shit up there and it stuck. He asked me why did it not come down? Now.. I could have explained about adhesion and cohesion, Van der Waals forces or acid-base interactions with the dooky and the roof... in my seconds of delay he explained it to me.

"Donal threw it so hard it would go into space! it it still going up!" and a few seconds later it fell. He was happy, I was happy he was happy?

Kind of like that with you today really.

Good for you! But you still aren't able to answer my question and I dare you to do so.

No amount of lack of education will change the fact that you aren't capable of answering it.

 

[Slartibartfast]

Good for you! But you still aren't able to answer my question and I dare you to do so.

No amount of lack of education will change the fact that you aren't capable of answering it.

But I did answer.

Just done some opening trades and I'm cooking baked potatoes now with proper crunchy skins, these are a novelty in Colombia.

I have some imported baked beans in tomato sauce from the UK and Philadelphia... Do you like baked potatoes? I'll post a photo later for you.

 

[NeoTrader]

But I did answer.

Just done some opening trades and I'm cooking baked potatoes now with proper crunchy skins, these are a novelty in Colombia.

I have some imported baked beans in tomato sauce from the UK and Philadelphia... Do you like baked potatoes? I'll post a photo later for you.

Quite the other way around, you admited evading it... You're attempts to keep evading answering it are quite embarrassing, not to bluntly say pathetic...

But I'll post it again here. Feel free to answer it, if you're capable of it and want to stop running from it.


"Given that guns are here to stay. How can laws be used to prevent people who have no respect for laws from getting their hands on guns?"

You avoided this question from the beginning, because this is the crucial point and this is where all your propositions are shown to be absurd. Because all your propositions are law, and people that follow the law don't do mass shootings and the people who do,obviously couldn't care less about ANY LAW"

 

[Slartibartfast]

Quite the other way around, you admited evading it... You're attempts to keep evading answering it are quite embarrassing, not to bluntly say pathetic...

But I'll post it again here. Feel free to answer it, if you're capable of it and want to stop running from it.


"Given that guns are here to stay. How can laws be used to prevent people who have no respect for laws from getting their hands on guns?"

You avoided this question from the beginning, because this is the crucial point and this is where all your propositions are shown to be absurd. Because all your propositions are law, and people that follow the law don't do mass shootings and the people who do,obviously couldn't care less about ANY LAW"

As you can see I have been busy:




And now we are watching The Post. Might be a while.

Is your question re-framed to mean any people anywhere or are we still in the realm of school shooters?