I haven't put anyone on ignore for years but you have managed to make the ignore list. You haven't said anything meaningful since you landed here and there is no point continuing to read your vacuous posts.
"He Never Went In": Officer On Duty Filmed "Doing Nothing" During Florida Shooting
- Thread starter Banjo
- Start date
I haven't put anyone on ignore for years but you have managed to make the ignore list. You haven't said anything meaningful since you landed here and there is no point continuing to read your vacuous posts.
What you think is enlightening actually isn’t. If the shooter in this particular school shooting had been subjected to a mental health screening he would not have gotten a gun.
Actually you're wrong again, this is another proof that your propositions don't work. He took the guns from the family's safe without the parents' permission, from what I read. And he passed the background check too. He had the guns there and they were locked and he agreed to only take them out if he told the parents. He was not supposed to have the key, only the father did. So, mental health screening wouldn't make a difference in this case again, since if he had not bought the guns for himself, he would simply use the guns from his father with the spare key he was not supposed to have. He would have access to guns one way or the other, even if he hadn't bought some of the guns himself.
And you evaded the question again.
And you evaded the question again.
Last edited:
Enjoy your possum dinner and let your mom sleep in the bed tonight, you got it last night.
I figured you would go after the number of shootings. To me any number of things like these are a tragedy. And your argument that this doesn't happen in other countries is simply false by the evidence I just showed, which clearly showed that in fact there were mass shootings in all countries you used as example for countries that alledgedly didn't have them.
The number of them is irrelevant. These other countries have had strict gun laws forever and still they happened, including your examples of "countries that don't have mass shootings". That alone should make you realize that gun bans don' work. Germany is another one. Very strict gun laws, but shootings still happened, 7 of them.
But if you still want to go after numbers, take one of our role models, for example: Canada.
They have population of 36.000.000 and they have had 5 school shootings.
The US has 325.000.000 and 40 shootings.
This shows that both countries have a similar number of shootings adjusted by population.
36/5 =7,2
325/40 = 8,1
Which is compatible with the logic that the distribution of maniacs in developed countries is roughly the same.
Which essentially, for thinking beings means: the problem is not lack of gun control. The problem are the maniacs, regardless of how strict the gun laws are BECAUSE MANIACS DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT LAWS. SO THEY WILL BREAK THE LAW BY BUYING GUNS ILLEGALY AND BY KILLING OTHER PEOPLE.
And your great idea is: last pass a law that prohibits people who respect the law by not buying guns if they are banned(which are people that would obviously not make a school shooting in the first place).
Non-traders & crypto kiddies take note, you are morons with numbers.
Last edited:
You should consider the possibility of yourself being the moron, since your chart covers exactly the period that extends from the inception of the "gun free zones"... So your chart actually corroborates with the assumption that gun free zones are one of the main causes of the problem or at the very least a useless idea.
Non-traders & crypto kiddies take note, you are morons with numbers.
And also, you might want to learn to argue like an adult and not a child whose arguments constantly include personal offenses.
You should consider the possibility of yourself being the moron, since your chart covers exactly the period that extends from the inception of the "gun free zones"... So your chart actually corroborates with the assumption that gun free zones are one of the main causes of the problem or at the very least a useless idea.
And also, you might want to learn to argue like an adult and not a child whose arguments constantly include personal offenses.
Assumptions.. like you could not find your own arse and you think you understand anything?
There is nothing wrong with calling a guy such as yourself who has a severe case of Dunning Kruger syndrome exactly what you are. A jumped up dunderhead who operates on feelings and maybes.
Let us remind ourselves of the great mind of NeoTrader shall we?
How fucking long? And now you do cryptos is it? Impressive.
It is past time to start slapping down dopey fools like you. You are fed NRA crap and spread the diseased thoughts of psychopaths through society.
Why not the increase in smartphones? On June 29, 2007, the first iPhone was released. That could correlate or a change in the color of stamps used in the Bulgarian post office?
FUCK THE NRA. Have a nice night now, ya here?
Wow... Your answer to the objective fact, exposed by your own chart, that the inception of gun free zones coincides with an increase in incidents, which proves at least that gun free zones did not have the slightest effect in decreasing incidents and may even have increased the number of them is a series of personal insults? Shocking!Assumptions.. like you could not find your own arse and you think you understand anything?
There is nothing wrong with calling a guy such as yourself who has a severe case of Dunning Kruger syndrome exactly what you are. A jumped up dunderhead who operates on feelings and maybes.
Let us remind ourselves of the great mind of NeoTrader shall we?
How fucking long? And now you do cryptos is it? Impressive.
It is past time to start slapping down dopey fools like you. You are fed NRA crap and spread the diseased thoughts of psychopaths through society.
Why not the increase in smartphones? On June 29, 2007, the first iPhone was released. That could correlate or a change in the color of stamps used in the Bulgarian post office?
FUCK THE NRA. Have a nice night now, ya here?
(NOT)And I'm supposed to be the one operating on feelings and assumptions here?
When you're ready to argue with facts and logic, something that is obviously not frequent given your lack of education, let me know.
Not that I expect that ever happening, since your behavior is the standart for leftists: "when confronted with facts and logic, not being able to argue like a civilized being, SCREAM, SHOUT AND OFFEND! And then pray that nobody perceives that you did that because you couldn't defend your ideas using the same means(logic and facts).
Wow... Your answer to the objective fact, exposed by your own chart, that the inception of gun free zones coincides with an increase in incidents, which proves at least that gun free zones did not have the slightest effect in decreasing incidents and may even have increased the number of them is a series of personal insults? Shocking!
And I'm supposed to be the one operating on feelings and assumptions here?
When you're ready to argue with facts and logic, something that is obviously not frequent given your lack of education, let me know.
Not that I expect that ever happening, since your behavior is the standart for leftists: "when confronted with facts and logic, not being able to argue like a civilized being, SCREAM, SHOUT AND OFFEND! And then pray that nobody perceives that you did that because you couldn't defend your ideas using the same means(logic and facts).
Now you change tack again, it is they don't help when before it was they are the cause of. You have no figures, just conjecture given to you by the NR FUCKING A.
You are a moron boy. You want to be treated with respect, YOU start by treating others with respect instead of mouthing off crap you hear without applying any critical thinking.
Honestly.. you little cry-bully twit.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/04/gun-free-zones-mass-shootings/
Last edited:
I'm not the one vomiting offenses and ACTUALLY being disrespectful in almost each and every line I write. You on the other hand, keep doing it instead of simply argueing like a civilized being. But keep them coming if you want, makes no difference to me, it's actually amusing to see leftists drown in their lack of education and of facts/reason.Now you change tack again, it is they don't help when before it was they are the cause of. You have no figures, just conjecture given to you by the NR FUCKING A.
You are a moron boy. You want to be treated with respect, YOU start by treating others with respect instead of mouthing off crap you hear without applying any critical thinking.
Honestly.. you little cry-bully twit.
And you provided the evidence. As I said: the chart clearly shows an increase in events after 1990, which was exactly the year the "gun free zones" were created. So even if they weren't the cause in the increase in incidents, at least it is crystal clear that they had absolutely ZERO effect in decreasing incidents.
And I suspect that being a typical leftist, as I said in my previous post, since you can't politely dispute this fact, if you answer me again, more insults with no logic or facts are coming again from you...