Please stop with the Invisible Hand job. Your bullshit argument essentially concludes that no regulation of any kind is required since the market is entirely self-correcting. History suggests otherwise.
"He Never Went In": Officer On Duty Filmed "Doing Nothing" During Florida Shooting
- Thread starter Banjo
- Start date
Why would I? Because you said so? Nobody can tell me what I can or cannot say(even though leftists love to think they can do that), especially people whose "best argument" when not being able to argue is simply "Seriously, STFU!"
Exactly, this is exactly what I mean.
It actually is the other way around, but since leftists such as yourself believe only what you want to believe in your dream world where facts and logic have no relevance, you say crap like this, as if you saying something proves anything.
But I'm not going to waste my time talking to someone whose only "arguments" are personal attacks and telling people to shut up because you can't argue against my points. If you are bothered by what I say, the ignore option is entirely at your disposal.
Why would I? Because you said so? Nobody can tell me what I can or cannot say(even though leftists love to think they can do that), especially people whose "best argument" when not being able to argue is simply "Seriously, STFU!"
Exactly, this is exactly what I mean.
It actually is the other way around, but since leftists such as yourself believe only what you want to believe in your dream world where facts and logic have no relevance, you say crap like this, as if you saying something proves anything.
But I'm not going to waste my time talking to someone whose only "arguments" are personal attacks and telling people to shut up because you can't argue against my points. If you are bothered tby what I say, the ignore option is entirely at your disposal.
I surmise you're either a young, know-nothing kid who's too lazy to be bothered to learn any history, or an old fart who forgot what little he may once have known. Either way, I suggest you take your faith-based dogma for a walk because it is shitting on your credibility.
Last edited:
from Twitter TheLastRefuge
Last edited:
Oh look... the "late 50-something internet lurking fag hag from Canada" is lecturing someone on credibility!
Clever. Adjust for the human element then.
The public safety is guaranteed by the companies own interest of not having it's clients die from it's products, because if it keeps happening the company goes broke.
But most important:
Why do you keep ignoring everything you can't argue against and stop trying to deviate from the subject?
Oh wait... I just answered my own question: Because you can't argue against it.
You write too much and are pretty scattershot with your communications. So it’s difficult to answer all 7 or 8 of your points without seeming scattershot myself.
If you have a particular point you want addressed let me know and I will address it.
The Tylenol thing proves effective safety steps can limit a liability to the population, and why shouldn’t the government learn from the private sector and vise versa?
Each point is simply answering your attempts to evade the subject. But I'll make it easy to you:
Given that you said that guns are here and they will stay. How do you imagine that a law or a set of laws will keep murderers(people who obviously couldn't care less about laws) from getting their hands on guns and using them to kill others?
And please be specific and practical. Tell me how do you intend to make people who don't respect law by killing others, to respect the law by not getting their hands on guns.
I don’t intend to do anything. This is really an issue for republicans. I am encouraged by Rick Scott’s leadership.
Here in America guns have become a dead issue for democrats. If people like me get involved republicans tend to focus on their dislike of democrats and forget to take action on guns. So the real question is what are republicans and the NRA going to do?