YOU don't fucking know. You know try to find out.
does earth revolve sun or that bs from Galileo's ass science?
Hawking: God did not create Universe
- Thread starter Free Thinker
- Start date
if you have a creation... logically there could be a Creator.
if the only universe you are aware of seems incredibly fine tuned for life... you have to admit to the possibility it was created by a Creator.
does that mean there was a Creator...no.
but at this point in time a Creator is a possibility.
if you wish to see the science of this...
study the fine tunings of the standard model of physics...
which was just used to predict the higgs boson at Cern.
for instance.. this is similar to dozens of quotes I have provided in the past...
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/could-the-higgs-nobel-be-the-end-of-particle-physics/
The Standard Model is regarded as a highly “unnatural” theory. Aside from having a large number of different particles and forces, many of which seem surplus to requirement, it is also very precariously balanced. If you change any of the 20+ numbers that have to be put into the theory even a little, you rapidly find yourself living in a universe without atoms. This spooky fine-tuning worries many physicists, leaving the universe looking as though it has been set up in just the right way for life to exist.
if the only universe you are aware of seems incredibly fine tuned for life... you have to admit to the possibility it was created by a Creator.
does that mean there was a Creator...no.
but at this point in time a Creator is a possibility.
if you wish to see the science of this...
study the fine tunings of the standard model of physics...
which was just used to predict the higgs boson at Cern.
for instance.. this is similar to dozens of quotes I have provided in the past...
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/could-the-higgs-nobel-be-the-end-of-particle-physics/
The Standard Model is regarded as a highly “unnatural” theory. Aside from having a large number of different particles and forces, many of which seem surplus to requirement, it is also very precariously balanced. If you change any of the 20+ numbers that have to be put into the theory even a little, you rapidly find yourself living in a universe without atoms. This spooky fine-tuning worries many physicists, leaving the universe looking as though it has been set up in just the right way for life to exist.
I don't fucking know what caused the big bang.
"You know try to find out."
I do not understand what you are trying to convey.
So do you think we live in a holographic universe?
we kn
understanding our universe take great effort and time. slow process. patience.
i think repeatability of physic/mathematic/logic is reliable, as it get, for now
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you say "Galileo's ass science?" Galileo observe and so he write the planets revolve around the sun. In that time he is persecuted and told to deny what he find. Persecuted from the Catholics. But Galileo is correct on what he see at that time.
So today Galileo is wrong for thinking the planets are circular, because the planets are the elliptical. Today the science say Galileo is correct to say the planets all orbit the sun. So really Galileo is not the "ass science".
Galileo open that door to truth. Today they study how the planets all work together from the gravity to orbit the earth. How each planet effect the orbit of going around the earth to all the planets.
You are correct.......................you might be wrong. Hawking's dumb ass?
You're an idiot. LOL
Hawking's recent work is crap. You are a dumb ass.
His earlier work many years ago did exhibit brilliance. Recent work total and utter crap.
It is extremely flawed. Anyone with half a brain can tear it apart.
Last edited:
Ha ha ha. Yes, you have half a brain and can tear it apart. LOL.
So we've established that you may be wrong, and have half a brain.
Now let's not be too hasty, FC. You have a choice here: WeT or Hawking. WeT or Hawking. Hmmm. Difficult.