I'm not referring to systematic as full-on 100% automated algo trading, but clearly defining a ruleset that has been backtested, and you will not deviate from it.
This is a misleading premise. Many people think they have a "system" but what they have are a bunch of ill-defined rules, that are not actually rules at all, but more like guidelines. (is that a quote from some comedy movie?)
"Clearly defined ruleset"
are scriptable-able. If they are not, then by definition, they are not clearly defined. And-Or worse, they are incomplete, meaning there are cases where there are no existing rules but should be.
One can't actually backtest, in a meaningful way, these ill defined "system".
I would council the OP to actually write up some rules in a scripting language:
When and how to enter.
When and how to exit.
Probably it will be an eye opener that these "Clearly Defined Rules", are so badly defined that they are incomplete (leave out too many situations), or so basic, they have no reasonable profit.
Another thing is these rules are usually created by cherry picking a few setups that had positive outcomes. That leaves out when they: go straight to negative, when they go negative and then recover, or are positive and then go negative, or go nowhere and the market closes.
Do your "rules" cover all those situations? If not there is work to be done.
OTH, just go discretionary, and pretend that you are experienced enough, technically, logistically, operationally and emotionally to master it. Then, try to sustain it for a couple of years. Not recommended for full time serious traders except as a "tour of duty" with support.