moron.. that is the baseline chart... of the filtration characteristics of the material.
the point of the study was to look at the effectiveness of the masks when worn by people...because breath leaks around the mask particularly by the bridge of the nose.
hence 9% for cloth and 12 percent for surgical efficiency...
Wow you just proved you had no comprehension of the article and the coincidence the mask efficiency matches your IQ
the point of the study was to look at the effectiveness of the masks when worn by people...because breath leaks around the mask particularly by the bridge of the nose.
hence 9% for cloth and 12 percent for surgical efficiency...
Wow you just proved you had no comprehension of the article and the coincidence the mask efficiency matches your IQ
Yeah... let's quote your study....
Recent observational studies and meta-analyses of mask effectiveness have estimated that mask usage reduces the risk of respiratory virus spread by 70% to 80%.22 Efficacy of home-made masks at preventing spread of influenza showed that surgical masks are three times more effective at blocking micro-organism transmission than home-made masks23–25 although none of these studies include randomized control trials.26 There is, however, evidence that communities in which masks were in widespread use exhibited significantly reduced community spread.
Let's also provide the table regarding mask filtration efficiency -- showing once again you are shoveling nonsense.
View attachment 266986
Last edited: