How can kudlow or American politicians say that the arrest or prosecution of China's top tech company not political and won't affect trade talks?
Trade is about companies selling to foreign markets.
Now if the US blocks Hauweii from selling it's products in the US and coercion it's allies to not buy from Hauweii, that is trade embargo. or trade sanction.
It's called market manipulation or market collusion to prevent competition and WTO says it's illegal. Countries cannot restrict foreign competition under wto rules with gov't bans etc . Tarriffs is fair but not bans just because it's a 'foreign' company. A ban is worse than tariffs. With tariffs, price is higher but you still have access to the market
IMO, unless there is proof or technical evidence Hauweii products are 'defective' or bad, this ban is just an attempt by 'gov't' to restrict competition is empitome of anti-free trade and violating WTO 'rules' or the goal of the world trade organiztion. or 'free markets' where anyone can enter the 'market' whether it's foreign, large or small etc.
It seems the Trump isn't commenting and Kudlow and politicians seem to avoid commenting for fear of being interfering with corrupt legal proceeding which is 'politically motivated' and media propaganda and rumors rather than facts that it's 5G equipment is 'flawed' or 'defective'. or free enterprise, it's was free enterprise in China and free enterprise that made this country great. small companies like Microsoft, small companies like google etc can enter into markets with better products, the benefit is the consumer or the public.
A trade war would reduce GDP or production for both countries and huge job losses in Hauweii, the company employs 100,000 people. more than GM or Microsoft or Apple so it's large company that China won't allow to fail. An insult to the country and Americans want to talk 'fair trade'
History has shown that trade embargos, sanctions etc are the reason for conflict or war. Countries invade other countries for valuable resources or trade routes.
Trade is about companies selling to foreign markets.
Now if the US blocks Hauweii from selling it's products in the US and coercion it's allies to not buy from Hauweii, that is trade embargo. or trade sanction.
It's called market manipulation or market collusion to prevent competition and WTO says it's illegal. Countries cannot restrict foreign competition under wto rules with gov't bans etc . Tarriffs is fair but not bans just because it's a 'foreign' company. A ban is worse than tariffs. With tariffs, price is higher but you still have access to the market
IMO, unless there is proof or technical evidence Hauweii products are 'defective' or bad, this ban is just an attempt by 'gov't' to restrict competition is empitome of anti-free trade and violating WTO 'rules' or the goal of the world trade organiztion. or 'free markets' where anyone can enter the 'market' whether it's foreign, large or small etc.
It seems the Trump isn't commenting and Kudlow and politicians seem to avoid commenting for fear of being interfering with corrupt legal proceeding which is 'politically motivated' and media propaganda and rumors rather than facts that it's 5G equipment is 'flawed' or 'defective'. or free enterprise, it's was free enterprise in China and free enterprise that made this country great. small companies like Microsoft, small companies like google etc can enter into markets with better products, the benefit is the consumer or the public.
A trade war would reduce GDP or production for both countries and huge job losses in Hauweii, the company employs 100,000 people. more than GM or Microsoft or Apple so it's large company that China won't allow to fail. An insult to the country and Americans want to talk 'fair trade'
History has shown that trade embargos, sanctions etc are the reason for conflict or war. Countries invade other countries for valuable resources or trade routes.
Last edited: