Hate Groups Are Infiltrating the Military

Quote from traderNik:
More...

But back to the topic at hand

It would be nice if you did stay on topic.

...do you agree that 99.9% of military personnel are good

No.

and would condemn the recent brutality?

If a microphone were jammed in their face, they would probably say what they thought they were supposed to say for fear of punishment.

Would you agree that 99.9% of our military personnel are deserving of our praise and thanks?

No.
 
OnT, "hate groups" have traditionally comprised military forces, from ethnic regiments in the british army, to large scale communist forces; most could be defined as hate groups, even down to generalised philosophy.

And if their not, their trained to be, by default, by function.

How specific do you need to be, to identify a "hate group" in an organisation that specialises in it?
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
It would be nice if you did stay on topic.
More...

Ok, I guess that means you believe it would be nice if I didn't bring up the subject of anal penetration in response to another member's post which contained no profanity or mention of anal penetration?

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1115309&highlight=your+Ahole#post1115309

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
If a microphone were jammed in their face, they would probably say what they thought they were supposed to say for fear of punishment.
More...

Ok, so let's see where you stand. In What proportion of randomly selected military personnel would condemn this recent act and actually mean it? This doesn't need to be scientific, just an approximate number. You have stated in this thread that you do not believe that the number of military personnel who would condemn this act and actually mean it is 999 out of 1000.

So would you agree that 99 out of 100 military personnel would condemn this act and really mean it, as opposed to condemning it out of fear of punishment?

If not, can you give us an indication? What percentage of service personnel either secretly or openly endorse the rape and murder, in your view?

Thanks,
Nik
 
Quote from traderNik:
More...

Ok, I guess that means you believe it would be nice if I didn't bring up the subject of anal penetration in response to another member's post which contained no profanity or mention of anal penetration?

So that makes you right in what you do?

ROTFLMAO....


Ok, so let's see where you stand. In What proportion of randomly selected military personnel would condemn this recent act and actually mean it?

About equivalent to general population would be my guess.

This doesn't need to be scientific, just an approximate number. You have stated in this thread that you do not believe that the number of military personnel who would condemn this act and actually mean it is 999 out of 1000.

Ridiculous question.

So would you agree that 99 out of 100 military personnel would condemn this act and really mean it, as opposed to condemning it out of fear of punishment?

No.

If not, can you give us an indication in terms of what percentage of service personnel you believe secretly endorse the rape and murder?

Equal to general population.
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Ok, I guess that means you believe it would be nice if I didn't bring up the subject of anal penetration in response to another member's post which contained no profanity or mention of anal penetration?

So that makes you right in what you do?

ROTFLMAO....


Ok, so let's see where you stand. In What proportion of randomly selected military personnel would condemn this recent act and actually mean it?

About equivalent to general population would be my guess.

This doesn't need to be scientific, just an approximate number. You have stated in this thread that you do not believe that the number of military personnel who would condemn this act and actually mean it is 999 out of 1000.

Ridiculous question.

So would you agree that 99 out of 100 military personnel would condemn this act and really mean it, as opposed to condemning it out of fear of punishment?

No.

If not, can you give us an indication in terms of what percentage of service personnel you believe secretly endorse the rape and murder?

Equal to general population.
More...

I'll leave alone for the time being the weird evasion regarding your constant evocation of anal penetration in response to posts that have nothing to do with anal penetration, vis-a-vis your request for me to remain on topic. It's getting to the point now where I can't be bothered with minor ownage like this. Suffice it to say that you are totally owned here.

So by inference, you believe that more than 1 out of 100 people in the general population would endorse the rape and murder of a randomly selected woman and the murder of three of her relatives including a 5 year old child?
 
Quote from traderNik:
More...

I'll leave alone for the time being the weird evasion regarding your constant evocation of anal penetration in response to posts that have nothing to do with anal penetration, vis-a-vis your request for me to remain on topic.

Do whatever you like, whatever....

So by inference, you believe that more than 1 out of 100 people in the general population would endorse the rape and murder of a randomly selected woman and the murder of three of her relatives including a 5 year old child?

If the selected woman were Muslim in Iraq, oh yes....
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Quote from me:

So by inference, you believe that more than 1 out of 100 people in the general population would endorse the rape and murder of a randomly selected woman and the murder of three of her relatives including a 5 year old child?
More...

If the selected woman were Muslim in Iraq, oh yes....
More...

gee you must be tired... as you can see in the very text you quoted, I mentioned randomly selected women.

But this is ok, since it highlights perfectly your dishonest and manipulative dialectic technique.

Goodbye.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top