Scataphagos Aug 24, 2021 #1 Apparently there was "pressure" on the FDA to grant approval. (Yet another political stunt?) So... the data are not in on "side effects", but still the jab gets "approval"? Attachments Other FDA approvals.PNG 136 KB · Views: 7 Last edited: Aug 24, 2021
Apparently there was "pressure" on the FDA to grant approval. (Yet another political stunt?) So... the data are not in on "side effects", but still the jab gets "approval"?
S Snarkhund Aug 24, 2021 #3 Scataphagos said: Apparently there was "pressure" on the FDA to grant approval. (Yet another political stunt?) View attachment 266508 So... the data are not in on "side effects", but still the jab gets "approval"? More... "FDA Approval" like that means anything. Nothing federal can be trusted. Nothing.
Scataphagos said: Apparently there was "pressure" on the FDA to grant approval. (Yet another political stunt?) View attachment 266508 So... the data are not in on "side effects", but still the jab gets "approval"? More... "FDA Approval" like that means anything. Nothing federal can be trusted. Nothing.
Overnight Aug 25, 2021 #4 2025, and 2027. Uh huh sure. Whatever. Some people are just fucking stupid.
