T The Kin Jul 15, 2008 #1 I asked a similar question not too long ago. The results were: 31% Yes, 38% PPT exists but are not intervening, 22% no such thing as PPT, and 9% I don't know. So I'm curious to see if attitudes have changed recently.
I asked a similar question not too long ago. The results were: 31% Yes, 38% PPT exists but are not intervening, 22% no such thing as PPT, and 9% I don't know. So I'm curious to see if attitudes have changed recently.
R RiceRocket Jul 15, 2008 #2 Isn't it obvious. Look at the amount of talks by the Fed, Paulson, and Bush all week. Also note the choppy ass action in the index futures intraday.
Isn't it obvious. Look at the amount of talks by the Fed, Paulson, and Bush all week. Also note the choppy ass action in the index futures intraday.
T The Kin Jul 15, 2008 #3 But last week 22% (21 people) on ET voted that there was no PPT. This link even has the logo of the PPT: http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/reports/pwgpolicystatemktturmoil_03122008.pdf There is also an awful lot of PPT (or PWG as the Treasury Department refers to it) activity here http://www.treas.gov/offices/domestic-finance/financial-markets/fin-market-policy/ Why vote no when it is so obvious?
But last week 22% (21 people) on ET voted that there was no PPT. This link even has the logo of the PPT: http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/reports/pwgpolicystatemktturmoil_03122008.pdf There is also an awful lot of PPT (or PWG as the Treasury Department refers to it) activity here http://www.treas.gov/offices/domestic-finance/financial-markets/fin-market-policy/ Why vote no when it is so obvious?
