Quote from ByLoSellHi:
Under that scenario, I agree.
Few people own 10 homes in California, though.
They're typically stuck with whatever the market bears (and imposes) in their local market.
Plus, California isn't immune from rapid housing deflation. It happened in 1987, and it was pernicious, nasty, and destroyed 38% of housing values, lasing until 1994.
Quote from Maverick74:
Bullshit. You can't tell me that a person whose home has gone up 400% in value is inflation. It's relative pricing. In other words, when Suzie Snowflake cashes out 400k in equity from the sale of her home, that is real money that has real purchasing power. Some of the appreciation in home values is because of inflation but a lot of it is supply and demand. There is no land in this country in urban areas and in nice neighborhoods. Let me put it another way, home prices in St.Louis, Kansas City, Oklahoma City, Des Moines, Omaha, etc, have seen no appreciation. Some have actually seen depreciation.
Quote from Businessman:
In reality most people cash out equity with a loan not by selling up. This is money mostly created by the lending bank out of thin air.
The house was probably bought with an mortgage in the first place as well, again money most created out of thin air.
Its a great big Ponzi scheme, as long as people can keep paying the interest on all this new credit it wont collapse.
Quote from JamesVU2000:
Its all about monetizing exisiting debt with even more debt. Our response to the nasdaq bubble was to double all existing mortgage debt in only a couple of years. Now its on to the corporate sector. We have to find new ways of producing debt to keep going.
Quote from JamesVU2000:
Elaborate please.