Harvard sacks professor for 'anti-Muslim' views

Quote from trader#21:

So it does not matters to you that the man is single-handedly fighting the government of world's largest democracy for a scam supposed to have squandered 40 billion dollars.

It does not matter that the 'views' for which he is victimized was a stand-alone statement given two years back and well-forgotten.

So Harvard wakes up all of a sudden and realizes that Dr. Swamy made a bad statement at some point of his life which has absolutely no relevance to his subject matter.

Typical smartass liberal attitude which brought down America.

FYI, he did not speak that in defense. To quote him:

"IIT/D sacked me in 1973. Four years later, I became a member of the IIT Board Governors--the very body which had sacked me!"

"My constitutency is the 100crore (billion) plus of India. I was doing Harvard a favour by taking 2 months out of a year to teach."

Maybe you should put your brain to work which is more than the size of apple seed and think whose stupid here.
More...

I am not sure what political point you think I was making because I was not making any. If you saw my rants here on ET you know I am for low taxes and less government and more freedom.

My core point was be that if I worked for a PC thought controlling outfit like Harvard, I would conduct my political agenda in private.
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

A bigot is a bigot is a bigot.

He got the gate, and that is good.
More...

Quote from trader#21:


Typical smartass liberal attitude which brought down America.
More...

No one bothers to dive into how a statement written 2 years back can all of a sudden spark controversy.

That article actually said that citizens who are causing anarchy and division in society who are mostly non-hindus should be disenfranchised. Also it never mentions regarding destruction of mosques in particular. It says that if temples can be destroyed for development of roads,etc then mosques should be considered similarly. Moreover mosques are never a holy place in a way that it is meant only as a symbol for collective prayer.

No one bothers why this timing so perfectly chimes with date Dr. Swamy got his hands on P Chindambran, most powerful cabinet minister in India involved in 2G scam.

I am trying to dig the original article which caused controversy, then everyone will be left speechless that Harvard is bigoted, not Dr. Swamy. The Havard has played the typical pussy, bowing under the pressure from Arabic world from where it gets lots of funding.
 
Quote from RewriteQuran:

Anti-Pakistan/Anti-Islam is a cheap tool/trick used by https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Forward_caste to promote/protect their hegemony over BC/SC/ST/Minority communities in India. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communal_Award
More...

1990s...

Reports of killing of Hindus, invariably Kashmiri Pandits, begin to trickle in; there are explosions; inflammatory speeches are made from the pulpits of mosques, using public address systems meant for calling the faithful to prayers.

As many as 300,000 Kashmiri Pandits have fled their home and hearth and been reduced to living the lives of refugees in their own country. An entire people have been uprooted from the land of their ancestors and left to fend for themselves as a weak-kneed Indian state shamelessly panders to Islamic terrorists and separatists who claim they are the final arbiters of Jammu and Kashmir's destiny.

Had this tragedy occurred elsewhere in Hindu majority India, and had the victims been Muslims, we would have described it as 'ethnic cleansing' and 'genocide.' We would have made films with horror-inducing titles. We would have filed cases in the Supreme Court of India. Our media would have marshalled remarkable rage in reporting the smallest detail.

http://www.jaia-bharati.org/anglais/gupta-kashmirpandits.htm
 
Quote from trader#21:

1990s...

Reports of killing of Hindus, invariably Kashmiri Pandits, begin to trickle in; there are explosions; inflammatory speeches are made from the pulpits of mosques, using public address systems meant for calling the faithful to prayers.

As many as 300,000 Kashmiri Pandits have fled their home and hearth and been reduced to living the lives of refugees in their own country. An entire people have been uprooted from the land of their ancestors and left to fend for themselves as a weak-kneed Indian state shamelessly panders to Islamic terrorists and separatists who claim they are the final arbiters of Jammu and Kashmir's destiny.

Had this tragedy occurred elsewhere in Hindu majority India, and had the victims been Muslims, we would have described it as 'ethnic cleansing' and 'genocide.' We would have made films with horror-inducing titles. We would have filed cases in the Supreme Court of India. Our media would have marshalled remarkable rage in reporting the smallest detail.

http://www.jaia-bharati.org/anglais/gupta-kashmirpandits.htm
More...

Caste = Religion.
There is no Hinduism in Globalization.
 
Thanks for illustrating here the typical Islamic mindset- genocide of other races/religions is deserving because your fucktard brain considers them inferior.

Now back to the point, who is bigoted, Harvard or Dr. Swamy?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top