That may be so. However, what does that imply these stalwarts of our community thought about Hillary?
Stormy has just trashed her credibility and I’m sure her own lawyers are reminding her of her right to silence and to use that right in the public domain.
Stormy needs to be credible because she has apparently breached a non-disclosure agreement with Trump. Stormy’s possible assertion that she did it for the “greater good” is severely diminished. In addition, less people will be pulling for her as they are less likely see her “good” person, regardless of her profession.
Juries have a very strong tendency to take their duties seriously, well beyond what you normally find on social media, and will likely assign great weight on Stormy’s recent comment.
She shot herself and any related cause in the foot with this comment to the gain of Trump.
This stormy business is, as of Trumps denial of any knowledge whatsoever, bizarre beyond belief. The contract would have had to have been drawn as a contract between Cohen and Daniels, I would guess, but then I am not a lawyer. I only play one on ET. I think jem is right in regard to only Daniels signature being needed, so long as Cohen did his part by paying money to Daniels, which she acknowledges,
AND the contract was drawn as a contract between Cohen and Daniels. (And that would be bizarre in itself, and might not stand, since it would involve her not speaking of a relationship between herself and third party that is not a party to the contract.) It seems, however, the contract was actually drawn not between Daniels and Cohen but between Daniels and a Another Party altogether, whose name just happens to be the same as Trumps Alias, where this other party apparently can not be located. This can't be! What the hell is going on here? The contract, I would guess, will have to be thrown out, and Cohen along with it, one can only hope, will be thrown out of the New York Bar Association . . .
Unless the Earth has suddenly gone flat on us, I don't think a contract can exist between two parties where one of the parties in the contract, regardless of whether their name or alias is mentioned as the second party in the contract, denies all knowledge of both the contract and any money that changed hands pursuant to the contract. In effect what we have here, as of Trump's total denial, is a bogus contract between a Party One, a Women whose alias is Stormy Daniels, and a Party Two, an apparently fictitious person, David Dennison, where a third party pops up out of a manhole and hands Party One, a wad of money.
YIKES!
